지역거점 공공청사의 공간구성에 관한 연구- 해외 사례를 중심으로 -

Abstract

As the information society has emerged, the public has enjoyed more active social participation, culture, and leisure and become interested in the use and management of public spaces and programs through which they can communicate. However, the government building has not flexibly coped with such demands and has been only used when necessary with its standardized spatial composition and programs. In this study, we investigate the government buildings as regional hubs where information exchange and communication occur as well as public goods representing a region and conducting its administrative work where local residents can have pride. We aim to use the study results as the basic data for the spatial composition of the local government building. The architectural expression of the regional hub can be realized through organic relations of spatial, visual, continuous, approach, empirical, organic, behavioral and perceptual expression. The excellent examples of the foreign government buildings as regional hubs classify programs as follows: publicity, local, and symbol programs. The spatial composition is divided into mutual exchange space, public support space, educational information space, and activity space. Layout the government buildings are classified as follows based on entrance to the government buildings and public communication space: courtyard type, integrated type, separate type, and contact type. Plans are classified as follows based on the bottom shape and function of the lower layer: distributed type, central type, and eccentric type. Façades are classified as follows based on the relations with the surrounding and material properties and composition: pattern types and regional-adaptation types. Sections are classified as follows based on spatial composition type: atrium type, aisle type, square type, and hybrid type. The government offices as regional hubs should be open space that reflects the cultural and historical characteristics of regions. They should promote voluntary citizen participation through differentiated space and programs and change from non-daily places to daily places.