Detailed Information

Cited 2 time in webofscience Cited 1 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Usefulness of ischemia-modified albumin in the diagnosis of sepsis/septic shock in the emergency departmentUsefulness of ischemia-modified albumin in the diagnosis of sepsis/septic shock in the emergency department

Other Titles
Usefulness of ischemia-modified albumin in the diagnosis of sepsis/septic shock in the emergency department
Authors
추승화임용수조진성장재호최재연최우성양혁준
Issue Date
Sep-2020
Publisher
대한응급의학회
Keywords
Sepsis; Shock; septic; Ischemia-modified albumin; Biomarkers
Citation
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine, v.7, no.3, pp.161 - 169
Journal Title
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
Volume
7
Number
3
Start Page
161
End Page
169
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/78334
DOI
10.15441/ceem.19.075
ISSN
2383-4625
Abstract
Objective No studies have evaluated the diagnostic value of ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) for the early detection of sepsis/septic shock in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). We aimed to assess the usefulness of IMA in diagnosing sepsis/septic shock in the ED. Methods This retrospective, observational study analyzed IMA, lactate, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin levels measured within 1 hour of ED arrival. Patients with suspected infection meeting at least two systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria were included and classified into the infection, sepsis, and septic shock groups using Sepsis-3 definitions. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine diagnostic performance. Results This study included 300 adult patients. The AUC (95% CI) of IMA levels (cut-off ≥85.5 U/mL vs. ≥87.5 U/mL) was higher for the diagnosis of sepsis than for that of septic shock (0.729 [0.667–0.791] vs. 0.681 [0.613–0.824]) and was higher than the AUC of procalcitonin levels (cut-off ≥1.58 ng/mL, 0.678 [0.613–0.742]) for the diagnosis of sepsis. When IMA and lactate levels were combined, the AUCs were 0.815 (0.762–0.867) and 0.806 (0.754–0.858) for the diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock, respectively. IMA levels independently predicted sepsis (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00–1.09; P=0.029) and septic shock (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02–1.11; P=0.002). Conclusion Our findings indicate that IMA levels are a useful biomarker for diagnosing sepsis/septic shock early, and their combination with lactate levels can enhance the predictive power for early diagnosis of sepsis/septic shock in the ED.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Choi, Jea Yeon photo

Choi, Jea Yeon
College of Medicine (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE