Misclassification and characterization of exposure to humidifier disinfectants using a questionnaire
- Authors
- Ryu, Hyeonsu; Choi, Yoon-Hyeong; Kim, Eunchae; Park, Jinhyeon; Lee, Seula; Yoon, Jeonggyo; Jo, Eun-Kyung; Choe, Youngtae; Heo, Jung; Yang, Wonho
- Issue Date
- 27-Jul-2021
- Publisher
- BMC
- Keywords
- Humidifier disinfectants; Misclassification; Past exposure assessment; Questionnaire
- Citation
- BMC Public Health, v.21, no.1
- Journal Title
- BMC Public Health
- Volume
- 21
- Number
- 1
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/81900
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12889-021-11459-4
- ISSN
- 1471-2458
- Abstract
- Background: Lung disease caused by exposure to chemical substances such as polyhexamethylene guanidine (PHMG) used in humidifier disinfectants (HDs) has been identified in Korea. Several researchers reported that exposure classification using a questionnaire might not correlate with the clinical severity classes determined through clinical diagnosis. It was asserted that the lack of correlation was due to misclassification in the exposure assessment due to recall bias. We identified the cause of uncertainty to recognize the limitations of differences between exposure assessment and clinical outcomes assumed to be true value. Therefore, it was intended to check the availability of survey using questionnaires and required to reduce misclassification error/bias in exposure assessment. Methods: HDs exposure assessment was conducted as a face-to-face interview, using a questionnaire. A total of 5245 applicants participated in the exposure assessment survey. The questionnaire included information on sociodemographic and exposure characteristics such as the period, frequency, and daily usage amount of HDs. Based on clinical diagnosis, a 4 × 4 cross-tabulation of exposure and clinical classification was constructed. When the values of the exposure rating minus the clinical class were ≥ 2 and ≤ − 2, we assigned the cases to the overestimation and underestimation groups, respectively. Results: The sex ratio was similar in the overestimation and underestimation groups. In terms of age, in the overestimation group, 90 subjects (24.7%) were under the age of 10, followed by 52 subjects (14.2%) in their 50s. In the underestimation group, 195 subjects (56.7%) were under the age of 10, followed by 80 subjects (23.3%) in their 30s. The overestimation group may have already recovered and responded excessively due to psychological anxiety or to receive compensation. However, relatively high mortality rates and surrogate responses observed among those under 10 years of age may have resulted in inaccurate exposure in the underestimation group. Conclusions: HDs exposure assessment using a questionnaire might not correlate with adverse health effects due to recall bias and various other causes such as recovery of injury and psychological anxiety. This study revealed exposure misclassification and characteristics affected by HDs and proposed a questionnaire-based exposure assessment methodology to overcome the limitations of past exposure assessment. © 2021, The Author(s).
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 의과대학 > 의예과 > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/81900)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.