Detailed Information

Cited 7 time in webofscience Cited 9 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-artificial intelligence using deep learning analysis of gallbladder polypoid lesions

Authors
Jang, Sung IllKim, Young JaeKim, Eui JooKang, HuapyongShon, Seung JinSeol, Yu JinLee, Dong KiKim, Kwang GiCho, Jae Hee
Issue Date
Dec-2021
Publisher
WILEY
Keywords
Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Endosonography; Gallbladder disease; Polyps
Citation
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, v.36, no.12, pp.3548 - 3555
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume
36
Number
12
Start Page
3548
End Page
3555
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/82993
DOI
10.1111/jgh.15673
ISSN
0815-9319
Abstract
Background and Aim Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the most accurate diagnostic modality for polypoid lesions of the gallbladder (GB), but is limited by subjective interpretation. Deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are under development. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of AI in differentiating polypoid lesions using EUS images. Methods The diagnostic performance of the EUS-AI system with ResNet50 architecture was evaluated via three processes: training, internal validation, and testing using an AI development cohort of 1039 EUS images (836 GB polyps and 203 gallstones). The diagnostic performance was verified using an external validation cohort of 83 patients and compared with the performance of EUS endoscopists. Results In the AI development cohort, we developed an EUS-AI algorithm and evaluated the diagnostic performance of the EUS-AI including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy. For the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic GB polyps, these values for EUS-AI were 57.9%, 96.5%, 77.8%, 91.6%, and 89.8%, respectively. In the external validation cohort, we compared diagnostic performances between EUS-AI and endoscopists. For the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic GB polyps, the sensitivity and specificity were 33.3% and 96.1% for EUS-AI; they were 74.2% and 44.9%, respectively, for the endoscopists. Besides, the accuracy of the EUS-AI was between the accuracies of mid-level (66.7%) and expert EUS endoscopists (77.5%). Conclusions This newly developed EUS-AI system showed favorable performance for the diagnosis of neoplastic GB polyps, with a performance comparable to that of EUS endoscopists.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles
보건과학대학 > 의용생체공학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Young Jae photo

Kim, Young Jae
IT (의공학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE