Low-Osmolar vs. Iso-Osmolar Contrast Media on the Risk of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Propensity Score Matched Studyopen access
- Authors
- Lee, Taeho; Kim, Won Ki; Kim, Ae Jin; Ro, Han; Chang, Jae Hyun; Lee, Hyun Hee; Chung, Wookyung; Jung, Ji Yong
- Issue Date
- Apr-2022
- Publisher
- FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
- Keywords
- contrast media (CM); osmolality; acute kidney injury (AKI); coronary artery disease; contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI); propensity score matching
- Citation
- FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, v.9
- Journal Title
- FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
- Volume
- 9
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/84502
- DOI
- 10.3389/fmed.2022.862023
- ISSN
- 2296-858X
- Abstract
- Objective:Among the various risk factors associated with contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), the importance of osmolality and viscosity is emerging among the characteristics of contrast media (CM) itself. High osmolality CM (HOCM) is deprecated and low osmotic pressure (LOCM) and iso-osmotic pressure (IOCM) are mainly used in clinical situations where the results of studies on their effect on the development of CI-AKI are contradictory. We evaluated the association between the type of CM and the risk of CI-AKI. Materials and MethodsA retrospective observational cohort study to analyze the effect of the type of CM on the development of CI-AKI. Using propensity score (PS) matching, 2,263 LOCM and IOCM groups were paired for analysis from 5,267 patients and fulfilled the inclusion criteria among 12,742 patients who underwent CAG between 1 January 2007, and 31 December 2016. LOCM included iopromide and iopamidol, IOCM was iodixanol. CI-AKI, which was the primary endpoint, was defined based on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria within 48 h after exposure to the CM. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used in the unmatched and matched cohorts, respectively. In addition, a stratified model on clinically important variables, including a high Mehran score (>= 6), was also used in the matched cohort. ResultsLOCM users showed an increased incidence of CI-AKI (11.7% vs. 9.3%; p = 0.006), but it lost statistical significance after PS matching (9.9% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.725). In multivariable analyses, the adjusted odds ratio for CI-AKI in the LOCM group were 1.059 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.875-1.282; p = 0.555] in unmatched cohort and 0.987 (95% CI = 0.803-1.214; p = 0.901) in matched cohort. These results were also consistent with the high-risk (high Mehran score) group. ConclusionsAlthough the role of CM types in the development of CI-AKI has been debated, our observation shows that the selection between LOCM and IOCM during CAG has no influence on the incidence of CI-AKI.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/84502)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.