Detailed Information

Cited 26 time in webofscience Cited 30 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Seismic behavior of an inverted T-shape flexible retaining wall via dynamic centrifuge tests

Authors
Jo, Seong-BaeHa, Jeong-GonYoo, MintaekChoo, Yun WookKim, Dong-Soo
Issue Date
Apr-2014
Publisher
SPRINGER
Keywords
Retaining wall; Dynamic earth pressure; Mononobe-Okabe method; Inertia effect; Dynamic centrifuge test
Citation
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, v.12, no.2, pp.961 - 980
Journal Title
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
Volume
12
Number
2
Start Page
961
End Page
980
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/87638
DOI
10.1007/s10518-013-9558-9
ISSN
1570-761X
Abstract
In the design procedure for a retaining wall, the pseudo-static method has been widely used and dynamic earth pressure is calculated by the Mononobe-Okabe method, which is an extension of Coulomb's earth pressure theory computed by force equilibrium. However, there is no clear empirical basis for treating the seismic force as a static force, and recent experimental research has shown that the Mononobe-Okabe method is quite conservative, and there exists a discrepancy between the assumed conditions and real seismic behavior during an earthquake. Two dynamic centrifuge tests were designed and conducted to reexamine the Mononobe-Okabe method and to evaluate the seismic lateral earth pressure on an inverted T-shape flexible retaining wall with a dry medium sand backfill. Results from two sets of dynamic centrifuge experiments show that inertial force has a significant impact on the seismic behavior on the flexible retaining wall. The dynamic earth pressure at the time of maximum moment during the earthquake was not synchronized and almost zero. The relationship between the back-calculated dynamic earth pressure coefficient at the time of maximum dynamic wall moment and the peak ground acceleration obtained from the wall base peak ground acceleration indicates that the seismic earth pressure on flexible cantilever retaining walls can be neglected at accelerations below 0.4 g. These results suggest that a wall designed with a static factor of safety should be able to resist seismic loads up to 0.3-0.4 g.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
공과대학 > 토목환경공학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Mintaek, Yoo photo

Mintaek, Yoo
Engineering (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE