Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Rehabilitation Using Digital Healthcare on Musculoskeletal Pain and Quality of Lifeopen access

Authors
Jang, SuhyunLee, BoramLee, EunjiKim, JungbinLee, Jong InLim, Jae-YoungHwang, Ji HyeJang, Sunmee
Issue Date
May-2023
Publisher
DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
Keywords
musculoskeletal disorder; rehabilitation; digital healthcare; pain; quality of life; patient-reported outcomes
Citation
JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, v.16, pp.1877 - 1894
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH
Volume
16
Start Page
1877
End Page
1894
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/88284
DOI
10.2147/JPR.S388757
ISSN
1178-7090
Abstract
Rehabilitation using digital healthcare (DHC) has the potential to enhance the effectiveness of treatment for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and associated pain by improving patient outcomes, while being cost-effective, safe, and measurable. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of musculoskeletal rehabilitation using DHC. We searched PubMed, Ovid-Embase, Cochrane Library, and PEDro Physiotherapy Evidence Database from inception to October 28, 2022 for controlled clinical trials comparing DHC to conventional rehabilitation. We used a randomeffects model for the meta-analysis, pooling the effects of DHC on pain and quality of life (QoL) by calculating standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between DHC rehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation (control). Fifty-four studies with 6240 participants met the inclusion criteria. The sample size ranged from 26 to 461, and the average age of the participants ranged from 21.9 to 71.8 years. The majority of the included studies focused on knee or hip joint MSD (n = 23), and the most frequently utilized DHC interventions were mobile applications (n = 26) and virtual or augmented reality (n = 16). Our meta-analysis of pain (n = 45) revealed that pain reduction was greater in DHC rehabilitation than in conventional rehabilitation (SMD: -0.55, 95% CI: -0.74, -0.36), indicating that rehabilitation using DHC has the potential to ameliorate MSD pain. Furthermore, DHC significantly improved health-related QoL and disease-specific QoL (SMD: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.29, 1.03; SMD: -0.44, 95% CI: -0.87, -0.01) compared to conventional rehabilitation. Our findings suggest that DHC offers a practical and flexible rehabilitation alternative for both patients with MSD and healthcare professionals. Nevertheless, further researches are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms by which DHC affects patient-reported outcomes, which may vary depending on the type and design of the DHC intervention.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
약학대학 > 약학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Jang, Sun Mee photo

Jang, Sun Mee
Pharmacy (Dept.of Pharmacy)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE