Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Artificial intelligence in urologic oncology: the actual clinical practice results of IBM Watson for Oncology in South Koreaopen access

Authors
Park, TaeyoungGu, PhilipKim, Chang-HeeKim, Kwang TaekChung, Kyung JinKim, Tea BeomJung, HanYoon, Sang JinOh, Jin Kyu
Issue Date
Dec-2023
Publisher
ELSEVIER INC
Keywords
Artificial intelligence; Interdisciplinary communication; Urologic neoplasms
Citation
PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, v.11, no.4, pp 218 - 221
Pages
4
Journal Title
PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL
Volume
11
Number
4
Start Page
218
End Page
221
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/90254
DOI
10.1016/j.prnil.2023.09.001
ISSN
2287-8882
2287-903X
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing our life, including the medical field. Repeated machine learning using big data made various fields more predictable and accurate. In medicine, IBM Watson for Oncology (WFO), trained by Memorial Slone Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), was first introduced and applied in 14 countries worldwide. Our study was designed to assess the feasibility of WFO in actual clinical practice. We aimed to investigate the concordance rate between WFO and multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) in Urologic cancer patients. Materials and methods: We reviewed retrospectively collected data for consecutive patients who underwent WFO and MTB simultaneously in the diagnosis of urologic malignancy before determining further treatment between August 2017 and September 2020. We compared the recommendation of the AI system, WFO (IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA), with the opinion of MTB for further managing all patients diagnosed with urologic malignancies such as prostate, bladder, and kidney cancer. Results: A total of 55 patients were enrolled in our study. The number of patients with prostate cancer was 48. The number of bladder and kidney cancer patients was 5 and 2, respectively. The overall concordance rate between WFO and MTB was 92.7%. Three patients could not suggest proper treatment options using WFO, and the recommended choice of WFO was not feasible in the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Conclusions: The decision of WFO showed a high concordance rate with a multidisciplinary tumor board for urologic oncology. However, some recommendations of WFO were not feasible in actual practice, and WFO still has some points to improve and modify. Interestingly, applying WFO is likely to facilitate a multidisciplinary team approach. (c) 2023 The Asian Pacific Prostate Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Tae Beom photo

Kim, Tae Beom
College of Medicine (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE