Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Choosing the right adjuvant therapy for stage III-IVA endometrial cancer: A comparative analysis of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy

Authors
Kim, Hyun JuLee, JoongyoLee, Kwang-BeomSung, KiHoonKim, Yong BaeKim, Young Saing
Issue Date
Mar-2024
Publisher
ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
Keywords
Adjuvant therapy; Stage III-IVA endometrial cancer; Radiotherapy; Chemotherapy; Locally advanced
Citation
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, v.182, pp 39 - 44
Pages
6
Journal Title
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume
182
Start Page
39
End Page
44
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/90819
DOI
10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.017
ISSN
0090-8258
1095-6859
Abstract
Objective. The optimal adjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced endometrial cancer (EC) remains debatable. We comparatively analyzed recurrence patterns and survival outcomes in patients with stage III-IVA EC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) exclusively or combined with radiotherapy (CRT). Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 184 patients treated for stage III-IVA EC at 2 tertiary institutions between 2010 and 2021. All patients underwent standard primary surgery and received either CT alone (n = 89) or CRT (n = 95) as an adjuvant treatment. We compared the failure patterns, recurrence -free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) between the CT and CRT groups. Results. The median follow-up period was 54.8 months. Most patients underwent pelvic (94.6%) or paraaortic (75.5%) lymphadenectomies. The 5 -year RFS was 69.2% with CRT versus 56.3% with CT (P = 0.038), and 5 -year OS was 86.1% versus 78.9% (P = 0.357). Pelvic and para-aortic recurrence rates were significantly higher in the CT group (pelvic: 29.2%; para-aortic: 20.2%) than in the CRT group (pelvic: 10.5%; para-aortic: 6.3%). The CRT group showed a higher rate of distant recurrence (CRT, 23.2% vs. CT, 14.6%) however, the 5 -year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence was not significantly different between the two groups (CRT, 28% vs. CT, 35%). Conclusions. This study highlights the potential benefits of adjuvant CRT in patients with stage III-IVA EC. The incorporation of molecular classification is necessary to derive optimal personalized adjuvant treatment strategies for this patient population. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Young Saing photo

Kim, Young Saing
College of Medicine (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE