Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Guselkumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: QUASAR Phase 2b Induction Studyopen access

Authors
Peyrin-Biroulet, LaurentAllegretti, Jessica R.Rubin, David T.Bressler, BrianGerminaro, MatthewHuang, Kuan-HsiangShipitofsky, NicoleZhang, HongyanWilson, RebbeccaHan, ChenglongFeagan, Brian G.Sandborn, William J.Panés, JulianHisamatsu, TadakazuLichtenstein, Gary R.Sands, Bruce E.Dignass, AxelAbrahamovych, OrestAfanasieva, HalynaAitova, LiliaAltintas, EnginAltwegg, RomainAndreev, PavelAomatsu, KazukiAugustyn, MonikaBalestrieri, PaolaBegun, JakobBrunatto, LucianaBulgheroni, DiegoBunkova, ElenaCabello, MercedesCao, QianCaprioli, FlavioCerqueira, RuteChen, BailiChen, Chou-ChenChen, Chou-PinChiu, Cheng-TangChoi, Chang HwanCicala, MicheleDatsenko, OlenaDewint, PieterDomenech, EugeniDutré, JorisDuvall, GeorgeFernandez, JuanFilip, RafalFogel, RonaldFowler, SharyleFujii, ToshimitsuFukata, MasayukiFurumoto, YoheiGasbarrini, AntonioGawdis-Wojnarska, BeataGilletta, CyrielleGionchetti, PaoloGoldin, EranGolovchenko, OleksandrGonciarz, MaciejGonen, CanSegura, Gaston GonzalezGridnyev, OleksiiGyokeres, TiborHébuterne, XavierHedin, CharlotteHellström, PerHilmi, Ida NormihaHorný, IvoHorvat, GyulaHoshi, NamikoHrdlicka, LudekIshihara, ShunjiIvanishyn, OlhaJang, Byung IkJunior, OderyKagaya, TakashiKanmura, ShujiKarakina, MarinaKatsuhiko, NakaiKierkus, JaroslawKim, Hyo JongKim, Tae-OhKim, Young-HoKiss, Gyula G.Klaus, JochenKleczkowski, DariuszKlopocka, MariaKobayashi, TakuKobielusz-Gembala, IwonaKoo, Ja SeolKopon, AdamKravchenko, TetianaKudo, MasatoshiKwon, Kwang AnLago, PaulaLaharie, DavidLawrance, IanLeszczyszyn, JaroslawLi, YanLukas, MilanMaaser, ChristianMaemoto, AtsuoMarusawa, HiroyukiMcBride, MatthewMendu, ShobaMiheller, PalMiyabayashi, HideharuMohl, WolfgangMoore, GregoryMotoya, SatoshiMurali, NarayanacharNaem, MohammedNakajima, KoichiNakamoto, YasunariNancey, StéphaneNeto, JoaquimOnizawa, MichioOno, YoheiOsada, TaroOsipenko, MarinaOwczarek, DanutaPatel, BhaktasharanPatel, KamalPetrova, ElinaPoroshina, ElenaPortela, FranciscoPrystupa, LyudmylaRivero, MonserratRoblin, XavierRomatowski, JacekRydzewska, GrazynaSaibeni, SimoneSakuraba, HirotakeSamaan, MarkSchultz, MichaelSchulze, JoergSedghi, ShahriarSeidler, UrsulaShin, Sung JaeStanislavchuk, MykolaStokesberry, DavidSuzuki, TakayoshiTaguchi, HirokiTankova, LyudmilaThin, LenaTkachev, AlexanderTorrealba, LeyaniraTsarynna, NataliiaTulassay, ZsoltUeo, TetsuyaValuyskikh, EkaterinaVasilevskaya, OlgaViamonte, ManuelWei, Shu-ChenWeisshof, RoniWojcik, KatarzynaYe, Byong DukYen, Hsu-HengYoon, HyukYoshida, KosukeYurkiv, AndriyZaha, OsamuZhan, Qiang
Issue Date
Dec-2023
Publisher
W.B. Saunders
Keywords
Advanced Therapy; Interleukin-23p19 Subunit Antagonist; QUASAR; Ulcerative Colitis
Citation
Gastroenterology, v.165, no.6, pp 1443 - 1457
Pages
15
Journal Title
Gastroenterology
Volume
165
Number
6
Start Page
1443
End Page
1457
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/90970
DOI
10.1053/j.gastro.2023.08.038
ISSN
0016-5085
1528-0012
Abstract
Background & Aims: The QUASAR Phase 2b Induction Study evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an interleukin-23p19 subunit antagonist, in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) with prior inadequate response and/or intolerance to corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and/or advanced therapy. Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, induction study, patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive intravenous guselkumab 200 or 400 mg or placebo at weeks 0/4/8. The primary endpoint was clinical response (compared with baseline, modified Mayo score decrease ≥30% and ≥2 points, rectal bleeding subscore ≥1-point decrease or subscore of 0/1) at week 12. Guselkumab and placebo week-12 clinical nonresponders received subcutaneous or intravenous guselkumab 200 mg, respectively, at weeks 12/16/20 (uncontrolled study period). Results: The primary analysis population included patients with baseline modified Mayo scores ≥5 and ≤9 (intravenous guselkumab 200 mg, n = 101; 400 mg, n = 107; placebo, n = 105). Week-12 clinical response percentage was greater with guselkumab 200 mg (61.4%) and 400 mg (60.7%) vs placebo (27.6%; both P <. 001). Greater proportions of guselkumab-treated vs placebo-treated patients achieved all major secondary endpoints (clinical remission, symptomatic remission, endoscopic improvement, histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement, and endoscopic normalization) at week 12. Among guselkumab week-12 clinical nonresponders, 54.3% and 50.0% of patients in the 200- and 400-mg groups, respectively, achieved clinical response at week 24. Safety was similar among guselkumab and placebo groups. Conclusions: Guselkumab intravenous induction was effective vs placebo in patients with moderately to severely active UC. Guselkumab was safe, and efficacy and safety were similar between guselkumab dose groups. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04033445. © 2023 The Authors
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE