Detailed Information

Cited 313 time in webofscience Cited 343 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Adjuvant Erlotinib Versus Placebo in Patients With Stage IB-IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (RADIANT): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial

Authors
Kelly, KarenAltorki, Nasser K.Eberhardt, Wilfried E. E.O'Brien, Mary E. R.Spigel, David R.Crino, LucioTsai, Chun-MingKim, Joo-HangCho, Eun KyungHoffman, Philip C.Orlov, Sergey V.Serwatowski, PiotrWang, JiuzhouFoley, Margaret A.Horan, Julie D.Shepherd, Frances A.
Issue Date
1-Dec-2015
Publisher
AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Citation
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, v.33, no.34, pp.4007 - +
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume
33
Number
34
Start Page
4007
End Page
+
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/9823
DOI
10.1200/JCO.2015.61.8918
ISSN
0732-183X
Abstract
Purpose Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) -tyrosine kinase inhibitors have proven efficacy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We hypothesized that erlotinib would be efficacious in the adjuvant setting. Patients and Methods An international randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in patients with completely resected IB to IIIA NSCLC whose tumors expressed EGFR protein by immunohistochemistry or EGFR amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Patients were assigned 2:1 to erlotinib 150 mg once per day or placebo for 2 years. Stratification factors were stage, histology, previous adjuvant chemotherapy, smoking status, EGFR amplification status, and country. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS); key secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and DFS and OS in patients whose tumors had EGFR-activating mutations (EGFRm-positive). Results A total of 973 patients were randomly assigned (November 26, 2007, to July 7, 2010). There was no statistically significant difference in DFS (median, 50.5 months for erlotinib and 48.2 months for placebo; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.10; P = .324). Among the 161 patients (16.5%) in the EGFRm-positive subgroup, DFS favored erlotinib (median, 46.4 v 28.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.98; P = .039), but this was not statistically significant because of the hierarchical testing procedure. OS data are immature. Rash and diarrhea were common adverse events occurring in 528 (86.4%) and 319 (52.2%) patients treated with erlotinib, respectively, versus 110 (32.1%) and 54 (15.7%) patients receiving placebo. The most common grade 3 adverse events in patients treated with erlotinib were rash (22.3%) and diarrhea (6.2%). Conclusion Adjuvant erlotinib did not prolong DFS in patients with EGFR-expressing NSCLC or in the EGFRm-positive subgroup. Further evaluation of erlotinib is warranted in the EGFRm-positive subgroup. (C) 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Cho, Eun Kyung photo

Cho, Eun Kyung
College of Medicine (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE