Dose conversion coefficients for neutron external exposures with five postures: walking, sitting, bending, kneeling, and squatting
- Authors
- Yeom, Yeon Soo; Griffin, Keith; Han, Haegin; Choi, Chansoo; Shin, Bangho; Nguyen, Thang Tat; Kim, Chan Hyeong; Lee, Choonsik
- Issue Date
- May-2021
- Publisher
- SPRINGER
- Keywords
- Dose coefficients; Neutrons; External exposures; Postures; Mesh-type reference computational phantoms
- Citation
- RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS, v.60, no.2, pp.317 - 328
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS
- Volume
- 60
- Number
- 2
- Start Page
- 317
- End Page
- 328
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/1182
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00411-021-00900-2
- ISSN
- 0301-634X
- Abstract
- In a previous study, posture-dependent dose coefficients (DCs) for photon external exposures were calculated using the adult male and female mesh-type reference computational phantoms (MRCPs) of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) that had been transformed into five non-standing postures (i.e. walking, sitting, bending, kneeling, and squatting). As an extension, the present study was conducted to establish another DC dataset for external exposures to neutrons by performing Monte Carlo radiation transport simulations with the adult male and female MRCPs in the five non-standing postures. The resulting dataset included the DCs for absorbed doses (i.e., organ/tissue-averaged absorbed doses) delivered to 29 individual organs/tissues, and for effective doses for neutron energies ranging from 10(-9) to 10(4) MeV in six irradiation geometries: antero-posterior (AP), posteroanterior (PA), left-lateral (LLAT), right-lateral (RLAT), rotational (ROT), and isotropic (ISO) geometries. The comparison of DCs for the non-standing MRCPs with those of the standing MRCPs showed significant differences. In the lateral irradiation geometries, for example, the standing MRCPs overestimate the breast DCs of the squatting MRCPs by up to a factor of 4 due to the different arm positions but underestimate the gonad DCs by up to about 17 times due to the different leg positions. The impact of different postures on effective doses was generally less than that on organ doses but still significant; for example, the standing MRCPs overestimate the effective doses of the bending MRCPs only by 20% in the AP geometry at neutron energies less than 50 MeV, but underestimate those of the kneeling MRCPs by up to 40% in the lateral geometries at energies less than 0.1 MeV.
- Files in This Item
-
Go to Link
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 공과대학 > 서울 원자력공학과 > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/1182)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.