Comparative risk of incidence and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 among proton pump inhibitor and histamine-2 receptor antagonist short-term users: a nationwide retrospective cohort studyopen access
- Authors
- Park, Jimyung; You, Seng Chan; Cho, Jaehyeong; Park, Chan Hyuk; Shin, Woon Geon; Park, Rae Woong; Seo, Seung In
- Issue Date
- Jan-2022
- Publisher
- BMC
- Keywords
- Retrospective studies; Pharmacovigilance; Epidemiology; Acid suppressants
- Citation
- BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, v.23, no.1, pp.1 - 10
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY
- Volume
- 23
- Number
- 1
- Start Page
- 1
- End Page
- 10
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/138443
- DOI
- 10.1186/s40360-022-00549-7
- Abstract
- Background
This study aimed to evaluate incidence risk and adverse clinical outcomes in COVID-19 disease among short-term users of acid-suppressants in South Korea.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study, conducted using a nationwide claims database for South Korea, used data from patients with COVID-19 tested between January 1 and May 15, 2020. Patients aged over 18 years and prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) for more than 7 days were identified. Primary outcome was COVID-19 while secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, hospitalization with respiratory disease, or intensive respiratory intervention. Large-scale propensity scores were used to match patients, while the Cox proportional hazard model was utilized to evaluate any association between exposure and outcome(s). The risk estimates were calibrated by using 123 negative control outcomes.
Results
We identified 26,166 PPI users and 62,117 H2RA users. After propensity score matching, compared to H2RA use, PPI use was not significantly associated with lower risk of COVID-19 (calibrated hazard ratio [HR], 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.30–2.19]); moreover, PPI use was not associated with adverse clinical outcomes in COVID-19, namely, hospitalization with respiratory disease (calibrated HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.72–1.08]), intensive respiratory interventions (calibrated HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.46–1.82]), except for all-cause mortality (calibrated HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.31–0.95]).
Conclusions
In this study, we found that the PPI user was not associated with risk of COVID-19 compared to H2RA users. There was no significant relationship between severe clinical outcomes of COVID-19 and exposure to PPI compared with H2RA, except for all-cause mortality.
- Files in This Item
-
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/138443)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.