Deep Residual Networks for User Authentication via Hand-Object Manipulationsopen access
- Authors
- choi,kanghae; Ryu, Hokyoung; Kim, Ji Eun
- Issue Date
- May-2021
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Keywords
- user authentication; user behaviour; hand movement; IMU-based wearable device; convolutional neural network; behavioural biometrics
- Citation
- SENSORS, v.21, no.9, pp.1 - 16
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- SENSORS
- Volume
- 21
- Number
- 9
- Start Page
- 1
- End Page
- 16
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/141892
- DOI
- 10.3390/s21092981
- Abstract
- With the ubiquity of wearable devices, various behavioural biometrics have been exploited for continuous user authentication during daily activities. However, biometric authentication using complex hand behaviours have not been sufficiently investigated. This paper presents an implicit and continuous user authentication model based on hand-object manipulation behaviour, using a finger-and hand-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based system and state-of-the-art deep learning models. We employed three convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep residual networks (ResNets) with multiple depths (i.e., 50, 101, and 152 layers) and two recurrent neural network (RNN)-based long short-term memory (LSTMs): simple and bidirectional. To increase ecological validity, data collection of hand-object manipulation behaviours was based on three different age groups and simple and complex daily object manipulation scenarios. As a result, both the ResNets and LSTMs models acceptably identified users’ hand behaviour patterns, with the best average accuracy of 96.31% and F1-score of 88.08%. Specifically, in the simple hand behaviour authentication scenarios, more layers in residual networks tended to show better performance without showing conventional degradation problems (the ResNet-152 > ResNet-101 > ResNet-50). In a complex hand behaviour scenario, the ResNet models outperformed user authentication compared to the LSTMs. The 152-layered ResNet and bidirectional LSTM showed an average false rejection rate of 8.34% and 16.67% and an equal error rate of 1.62% and 9.95%, respectively.
- Files in This Item
-
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 기술경영전문대학원 > 서울 기술경영학과 > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/141892)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.