Artificial Intelligence Cases in China: Feilin v. Baidu and Tencent Shenzhen v. Shanghai Yingxinopen access
- Authors
- Lee, Ju Yoen
- Issue Date
- Mar-2021
- Publisher
- YIJUN INST INT LAW
- Keywords
- AI; Feilin v. Baidu; Tencent Shenzhen v. Shanghai Yingxin; Beijing Internet Court; Shenzhen Nanshan District People' s Court
- Citation
- CHINA AND WTO REVIEW, v.7, no.1, pp.211 - 222
- Indexed
- SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- CHINA AND WTO REVIEW
- Volume
- 7
- Number
- 1
- Start Page
- 211
- End Page
- 222
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/142203
- DOI
- 10.14330/cwr.2021.7.1.11
- ISSN
- 2383-8221
- Abstract
- In 2019, two court rulings in China on the issue of copyright ability of Al creations received international attention. It was reported that in Feilin v. Baidu, known as the first AI case, the Beging Internet Court denied copyright of AI creations, whereas the Shenzhen Nanshan District People's Court acknowledged copyright of Al creations in the Tencent Dreamwriter case. The two cases, however, were quite similar, as they acknowledged copyright of Al-assisted, not Al-generated, written works and recognized these works as a work of a legal entity. The difference between the two judgments is that the Beying Internet Court regarded originality as an independent requirement and judged it according to the objective standard, whereas the Shenzhen Nanshan District People's Court regarded human creation as part of the requirement of originality. In this sense, it was the Beying Internet Court that actually made the more favorable judgment on an Al-generated work.
- Files in This Item
-
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 법학전문대학원 > 서울 법학전문대학원 > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.