Detailed Information

Cited 15 time in webofscience Cited 13 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The hidden costs of energy and mobility: A global meta-analysis and research synthesis of electricity and transport externalitiesopen access

Authors
Sovacool, Benjamin K.Kim, JinsooYang, Minyoung
Issue Date
Feb-2021
Publisher
ELSEVIER
Keywords
Externalities; Social costs of energy; Energy markets; Market failure; Climate change; Air pollution; Traffic congestion
Citation
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, v.72, pp.1 - 22
Indexed
SSCI
SCOPUS
Journal Title
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
Volume
72
Start Page
1
End Page
22
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/142304
DOI
10.1016/j.erss.2020.101885
ISSN
2214-6296
Abstract
What is the range and scope of externalities associated with electricity supply, energy efficiency, and transport? What research methods and techniques of valuation does the community use to monetize these externalities? What policy implications arise in terms of better governing energy and mobility systems? To answer these questions, this study offers a comprehensive and global research synthesis of externalities for energy and mobility. It synthesizes data from 139 studies with 704 distinct estimates to examine the hidden social and environmental costs. The mean external cost for electricity supply is 7.15d/kWh. When correlating this with the actual amount of electricity generated per year, the amount is $11.644 trillion. This likely exceeds both the reported revenues for electricity sales, oil and gas production as well as the levelized costs of energy. The mean external cost for mobility is 17.8d/km. Using differentiated estimations of the externalities associated with aviation, road travel for passengers and freight, rail, and coastal water/marine modes of travel, transport's global externalities amount to another $13.018 trillion. When combined, this $24.662 trillion in externalities for energy and transport is equivalent to 28.7% of global Gross Domestic Product. Energy efficiency or demand response by contrast has net positive externalities of approximately 7.8d/kWh. When put into the context of global efficiency and demand management efforts, this approaches an annual positive value of $312 billion. The fundamental policy question is whether we want global markets that manipulate the presence of externalities to their advantage, or a policy regime that attempts to internalize them.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 공과대학 > 서울 자원환경공학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Jinsoo photo

Kim, Jinsoo
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING (DEPARTMENT OF EARTH RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE