Detailed Information

Cited 5 time in webofscience Cited 6 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for radiotherapy planning in patients with lung cancer: a meta-analysisopen access

Authors
Lee, Soo JinPark, Hae Jin
Issue Date
Sep-2020
Publisher
NATURE PORTFOLIO
Citation
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, v.10, no.1, pp.1 - 11
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume
10
Number
1
Start Page
1
End Page
11
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/145192
DOI
10.1038/s41598-020-71445-5
ISSN
2045-2322
Abstract
Functional imaging modalities enable practitioners to identify functional lung regions. This analysis evaluated the feasibility of nuclear medicine imaging to avoid doses to the functional lung in radiotherapy (RT) planning for patients with lung cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out according to PRISMA-P guidelines. A search of EMBASE and PubMed for studies published throughout the last 20 years was performed using the following search criteria: (a) 'lung cancer' or 'lung malignancy' and (b) 'radiotherapy' or 'radiation therapy' or 'RT planning' and (c) 'SPECT' or 'single positron emission computed tomography' or 'functional image.' The analyzed planning parameters were the volumes of the normal lung that have received >= 10 Gy and >= 20 Gy of radiation (V10 and V20, respectively) and the mean lung dose (MLD). We compared the planning parameters obtained from anatomical RT planning and functional RT planning using perfusion or ventilation imaging ('V10, V20 or MLD' in anatomical plan vs. 'fV10, fV20 or fMLD' in functional plan). A total of 309 patients with 344 RT plan sets from 15 publications (11 perfusion SPECT, 2 ventilation SPECT, and 1 SPECT and 1 PET with both perfusion and ventilation) were included in the meta-analysis. The standard mean differences in planning parameters in functional plans using nuclear imaging were significantly reduced compared to those of anatomical plans (P<0.01 for all): -0.42 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.78 to -0.07) for 'V10 vs. fV10 ', -0.41 (95% CI -0.64 to -0.17) for 'V20 vs. fV20 ', and -0.24 (95% CI -0.45 to -0.03) for 'MLD vs. fMLD'. In subgroup analysis, the functional plan using perfusion was significantly lower than the anatomical plan in all planning parameters, but there was no significant difference for ventilation. RT planning with nuclear functional lung imaging has potential to reduce radiation-induced lung injury. Perfusion imaging seems to be more promising than ventilation imaging for all planning parameters. There were not enough studies using ventilation imaging to determine what the effect is on the lung plan parameters.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 방사선종양학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher PARK, HAE JIN photo

PARK, HAE JIN
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE