Lot quality assurance sampling to assess coverage and compliance following mass drug administration to eliminate lymphatic filariasis in Fiji: A methodological approachopen access
- Authors
- Rinamalo, Milika; Pezzoli, Lorenzo; Kama, Mike; Rafai, Eric; Kubuabola, Ilisapeci; Salusalu, Mosese; Kim, Sung Hye
- Issue Date
- Sep-2020
- Publisher
- PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
- Citation
- PLOS ONE, v.15, no.9, pp.1 - 17
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- PLOS ONE
- Volume
- 15
- Number
- 9
- Start Page
- 1
- End Page
- 17
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/145198
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0238622
- ISSN
- 1932-6203
- Abstract
- Background
Assessing the quality of mass drug administration (MDA) rounds is a key component of lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination programs. Routine collection of administrative coverage is unreliable, especially when pockets with low program coverage exist. To address this gap, we used lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) following the 10th annual LF-MDA round in Fiji to explore whether there was any area in which target coverage was not reached. We also assessed the level of drug compliance and satisfaction with the LF-MDA implementation strategy.
Methodology/principal findings
We conducted a cross-sectional household survey in 3 divisions of Fiji. For LQAS, we defined 19 lots in 7 medical areas of the Suva sub-division and another 12 sub-divisions in the Central, Northern, and Eastern Divisions. A sample of 16 randomly selected household members was taken un each lot. We defined our decision rule as follows: if more than 1 person in a given lot did not swallow the medication, coverage was considered inadequate, i.e. less than 80%.
Of the 7 lots in Suva sub-division and 12 lots in the 3 divisions, five and two lots, respectively, were identified as having inadequate coverage. The overall program coverage estimated from 304 samples was 92%, which was higher than the reported administrative coverage of 82%. About 98% of interviewees were offered the medication and 96% swallowed it. Non-participation arose from insufficient information on how to obtain the drugs. At least 92% were satisfied with the LF-MDA implementation strategy.
Conclusions
Areas of low program coverage with results discordant with the reported administrative coverage existed in both urban and rural settings. Drug compliance and satisfaction were high, even after repeated rounds. We recommend increasing efforts to deliver the service in those areas with inadequate program coverage, as well as conducting timely coverage assessment through LQAS for corrective action.
- Files in This Item
-
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 의과대학 > 서울 환경의생물학교실 > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/145198)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.