Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Anaerobic Bacterial Clinical Isolates From 2014 to 2016, Including Recently Named or Renamed Speciesopen access

Authors
Byun, Jung-HyunKim, MyungsookLee, YangsoonLee, KyungwonChong, Yunsop
Issue Date
2019
Publisher
KOREAN SOC LABORATORY MEDICINE
Keywords
Antimicrobial resistance pattern; Anaerobes; Bacteroides; Korea
Citation
ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, v.39, no.2, pp.190 - 199
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE
Volume
39
Number
2
Start Page
190
End Page
199
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/148679
DOI
10.3343/alm.2019.39.2.190
ISSN
2234-3806
Abstract
Background: Anaerobic bacterial resistance trends may vary across regions or institutions. Regional susceptibility patterns are pivotal in the empirical treatment of anaerobic infections. We determined the antimicrobial resistance patterns of clinically important anaerobic bacteria, including recently named or renamed anaerobes. Methods: A total of 521 non-duplicated clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria were collected from a tertiary-care hospital in Korea between 2014 and 2016. Anaerobes were isolated from blood, body fluids, and abscess specimens. Each isolate was identified by conventional methods and by Bruker biotyper mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltonics, Leipzig, Germany) or VITEK matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (bioMerieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France). Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using the agar dilution method according to the CLSI guidelines. The following antimicrobials were tested: piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoxitin, cefotetan, imipenem, meropenem, clindamycin, moxifloxacin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and metronidazole. Results: Most Bacteroides fragilis isolates were susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, and meropenem. The non-fragilis Bacteroides group (including B. intestinalis, B. nordii, B. pyogenes, B. stercoris, B. salyersiae, and B. cellulosilyticus) was resistant to meropenem (14%) and cefotetan (71%), and Parabacteroides distasonis was resistant to imipenem (11%) and cefotetan (95%). Overall, the Prevotella and Fusobacterium isolates were more susceptible to antimicrobial agents than the B. fragilis group isolates. Anaerobic gram-positive cocci exhibited various resistance rates to tetracycline (6-86%). Clostridioides difficile was highly resistant to penicillin, cefoxitin, imipenem, clindamycin, and moxifloxacin. Conclusions: Piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoxitin, and carbapenems are highly active beta-lactam agents against most anaerobes, including recently named or renamed species.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 진단검사의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Yang soon photo

Lee, Yang soon
서울 의과대학 (DEPARTMENT OF LABORATORY MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE