Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Risk of olfactory dysfunction of the workers in the automobile repair, printing, shoemaking and plating industries in Korea: a cross-sectional studyopen access

Authors
Lee, Soo-JinKim, Eun-MiCho, Seok-HyunSong, JaechulJang, Tae-WonLee, Mi-Young
Issue Date
Nov-2018
Publisher
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
Keywords
occupation; olfactory; prevalence; prevalence ratio
Citation
BMJ OPEN, v.8, no.11, pp.1 - 6
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
BMJ OPEN
Volume
8
Number
11
Start Page
1
End Page
6
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/149058
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022678
ISSN
2044-6055
Abstract
Objectives The present study was performed to investigate the prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in workers exposed to hazardous substances in a variety of occupations in Korea. Methods We designed a cross-sectional study. The exposed group (n=296) consisted of Korean workers in the automobile repair, printing, shoemaking and plating industries and was compared with office workers (non-exposed group, n=99). A self-report questionnaire was administered to the subjects for demographic characteristics. In addition, olfactory function was evaluated using the Korean version of Sniffin's Stick (KVSS) I and II test, which has been reported to be valid and reliable in Korean subjects. KVSS I score 7or KVSS II score 30 was classified as normal, KVSS I score <7or KVSS II score <30 was classified as oflactory dysfunction. The statistical analyses were performed with olfactory dysfunction as a dependent variable to calculate prevalence ratio (PR) of the exposed group. Results The prevalence of olfactory dysfunction was 21.2% in office, 45.1% in automobile repair, 69.7% in printing and 88.9% in shoemaking and plating workers. The adjusted PR was highest in plating (3.589, 95% CI 1.957 to 6.583), followed by shoemaking (3.136, 95%CI 1.763 to 5.579), printing (2.669, 95%CI 1.610 to 4.424) and automobile repair (1.914, 95%CI 1.105 to 3.317) workers. Conclusions In comparison with office workers, the prevalence of olfactory dysfunction and the PR of olfactory dysfunction were very high in the four occupational groups. This finding could be an important basis for establishing the olfactory dysfunction prevention policy for workers who are exposed to hazardous substances or work in high-risk occupations.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 직업환경의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles
서울 의과대학 > 서울 이비인후과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Jang, Tae Won photo

Jang, Tae Won
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE