Cited 0 time in
Efficacy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT for Detecting Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Dong Won | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Song, Chang Myeon | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ji, Yong Bae | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kim, Ji Young | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Choi, Yun Young | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Ji Young | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Tae, Kyung | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-11T15:45:40Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-07-11T15:45:40Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2473-974X | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/149674 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective To evaluate the efficacy of preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for detecting cervical lymph node (LN) metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting University tertiary care facility. Subjects and Methods We retrospectively compared the pathologic results for 409 cervical LN levels in 140 patients who underwent thyroidectomy and central neck dissection with/without lateral neck dissection with the findings of preoperative PET/CT, ultrasonography (US), and CT. We judged LN metastasis in PET/CT using the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) at the optimal cutoff value in receiver operating characteristic curves and compared the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of the 3 imaging tools. Results At all neck levels (central and lateral compartments), PET/CT had a sensitivity of 57.5%, specificity of 68.6%, and diagnostic accuracy of 63.6% when the cutoff value of SUVmax was 1.125. The corresponding values were 59.1%, 90.6%, and 76.3%, respectively, for US and 53.8%, 91.9%, and 74.6% for CT. In the central compartment (level VI), sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 48.9%, 67.4%, and 59.9% for PET/CT (cutoff SUVmax 1.125); 47.8%, 96.3%, and 76.7% for US; and 41.3%, 97.0%, and 74.4% for CT, respectively. In the lateral compartment (levels II-V), the corresponding values of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 70.2%, 69.3%, and 69.8% for PET/CT (cutoff SUVmax 1.055); 70.2%, 81.8%, and 75.8% for US; and 65.9%, 84.1%, and 74.7% for CT. Conclusion PET/CT is less effective as a preoperative diagnostic tool for detecting cervical lymph node metastasis in PTC than US or CT. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 7 | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | SAGE Publishing | AAO-HNSF | - |
| dc.title | Efficacy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT for Detecting Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/2473974X18788545 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85091224263 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | OTO Open, v.2, no.3, pp 1 - 7 | - |
| dc.citation.title | OTO Open | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 2 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 1 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 7 | - |
| dc.type.docType | 정기학술지(Article(Perspective Article포함)) | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | computed tomography | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | fluorodeoxyglucose F18 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | lymph node | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | papillary thyroid carcinoma | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | positron emission tomography | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | ultrasonography | - |
| dc.identifier.url | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2473974X18788545 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea+82-2-2220-1366
COPYRIGHT © 2024 HANYANG UNIVERSITY.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
