Global IR through dialogue
- Authors
- Eun, Yong Soo
- Issue Date
- Mar-2019
- Publisher
- ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
- Keywords
- Global IR; West-non-West divide; dialogue; mutual learning; complementary reciprocity; ' instrumentalist' approach; constructivism; ' superior' identity; East Asia
- Citation
- PACIFIC REVIEW, v.32, no.2, pp.131 - 149
- Indexed
- SSCI
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- PACIFIC REVIEW
- Volume
- 32
- Number
- 2
- Start Page
- 131
- End Page
- 149
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/15011
- DOI
- 10.1080/09512748.2018.1461680
- ISSN
- 0951-2748
- Abstract
- This article aims to address how to ensure a two-way 'dialogue' across 'the West/non-West distinction' in international studies. To this end, I first discuss three different approaches to dialogue, the Socratic, the Habermasian, and the Weberian, and clarify what kind of thing dialogue should be if it is to overcome the 'West-non-West divide' and transform the current 'Western-centric' IR into a global discipline. I argue that dialogue should be understood as reciprocal feedback from different perspectives for mutual learning. In order to achieve this goal (i.e. mutual learning), I call for an 'instrumentalist' approach to dialogue. To elucidate this point, I offer an empirical illustration. The focus here is on dialogue as mutual learning between Western-centric IR theory, more specifically constructivism, and the indigenous experience and knowledge of East Asia.
- Files in This Item
-
Go to Link
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 사회과학대학 > 서울 정치외교학과 > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/15011)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.