Multicenter, randomized single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery (SIMPLE) trial in colon cancer: an interim analysis
- Authors
- Kang, Byung Mo; Kim,Hyung Jin; Kye,Bong-Hyeon; Lee, Sang Chul; Lee, Kil Yeon; Park, Sun Jin; Lee, Suk-Hwan; Lim, Sang Woo; Lee, Yoon Suk; Kim, Ji Hoon; Lee,Jinkwon; Kim, Min Ki; Kim,Jun-Gi
- Issue Date
- Mar-2018
- Publisher
- SPRINGER
- Keywords
- Colon cancer; Laparoscopy; Randomized controlled trial; Short-term outcomes; Single-port
- Citation
- SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, v.32, no.3, pp.1540 - 1549
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Volume
- 32
- Number
- 3
- Start Page
- 1540
- End Page
- 1549
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/150361
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00464-017-5842-0
- ISSN
- 0930-2794
- Abstract
- Background: Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) was recently introduced as an innovative minimally invasive surgery method. Retrospective studies have revealed the safety and feasibility of SPLS for colon cancer treatment. However, no prospective randomized trials have been performed. The multicenter, randomized SIMPLE (single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery) trial aimed to investigate short-term perioperative outcomes of SPLS for colon cancer treatment, compared with multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS). Methods: Between August 2011 and April 2014, a total of 194 patients with colon cancer were recruited from seven hospitals in Korea. Patients were randomly allocated into the SPLS group (n = 99) or MPLS group (n = 95). The primary endpoint was postoperative complications. Operative, postoperative, and pathologic outcomes were analyzed after 50% of the patient study population had been recruited. Results: The patients’ demographic characteristics, operative times, estimated blood volume losses, numbers of harvested lymph nodes, and lengths of both resection margins were not significantly different between groups. In the SPLS group, the rates of conversion to MPLS and open surgery were 12.9 and 2.2%, respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in 10.8% of the SPLS, and 12.5% of the MPLS patients (p = 0.714). Times to functional recovery, pain scores, and amounts of analgesia were similar between groups. Conclusion: The results of this interim analysis suggested that SPLS is technically safe and appropriate when used for radical resection of colon cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01480128).
- Files in This Item
-
Go to Link
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 의과대학 > 서울 교육협력지원교실 > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.