No noticeable difference evaluation of image data compression
- Authors
- Jang, Euee S.
- Issue Date
- Jul-2017
- Publisher
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
- Keywords
- Image compression; JPEG; JPEG2000; Subjective evaluation
- Citation
- "Proceedings of 2016 5th International Conference on Network Infrastructure and Digital Content, IEEE IC-NIDC 2016, pp.505 - 509
- Indexed
- SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- "Proceedings of 2016 5th International Conference on Network Infrastructure and Digital Content, IEEE IC-NIDC 2016
- Start Page
- 505
- End Page
- 509
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/152077
- DOI
- 10.1109/ICNIDC.2016.7974626
- Abstract
- In this paper, a new way of evaluating image compression performance is proposed in order to reflect the human visual perception perspective in image compression and its applications: “No noticeable difference (NND) is allowed in commercial use.” Various methodologies have been proposed and utilized to evaluate image compression performance with both objective and subjective measures for the given rate-distortion curve, which is used to claim that a codec is better than another in a quantitative manner. In this paper, a NND-based subjective experiment is carried out to see if the existing standard image codecs such as JPEG and JPEG2000 still make a reasonable difference in performance. The experimental results on standard test images reveal that there is no great difference in performance between the two standard codecs including a few cases where JPEG outperformed JPEG2000.
- Files in This Item
-
Go to Link
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 공과대학 > 서울 컴퓨터소프트웨어학부 > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.