Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Combined use of dexmedetomidine and propofol in monitored anesthesia care: a randomized controlled studyopen access

Authors
Kim, Kyu NamLee, Hee JongKim, Soo YeonKim, Ji Yoon
Issue Date
Mar-2017
Publisher
BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
Keywords
Combination drug therapy; Deep sedation; Dexmedetomidine; Propofol
Citation
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, v.17, pp.1 - 7
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume
17
Start Page
1
End Page
7
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/152755
DOI
10.1186/s12871-017-0311-9
ISSN
1471-2253
Abstract
Backgroud: Although propofol and dexmedetomidine have been widely used for monitored anesthesia care, their adverse effects necessitate the search for better methods. Therefore, we performed this randomized controlled trial to evaluate the combined use of propofol and dexmedetomidine. Methods: Eighty-seven adult patients undergoing hand surgery under brachial plexus block were randomly allocated to receive 1.6 mu g/ml of the target effect site concentration of propofol (P group) and infusion of 0.4 mu g/kg/h dexmedetomidine following a loading dose of 1.0 mu g/kg for 10 min (D group). The M group received a half-dose of both drugs simultaneously. The maintenance dose was adjusted to maintain an Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score of 3. Cardiorespiratory variables, adverse effects, and drug efficacy were observed. Results: The significantly higher mean arterial pressure (mmHg) in the D group [P group 86.9 (12.6), D group 96.0 (12.2), M group 85.6 (10.6), p = 0.004)] and a significantly higher heart rate (beat/min) in the P group were observed [P group 67.3 (9.0), D group 57.8 (6.9), M group 59.2 (7.4), p < 0.001)]. The M group had a significant lower incidence of airway obstruction (p < 0.001) and the D group had a higher incidence of bradycardia requiring atropine (p = 0. 001). The P group had higher incidences of hypoxia (p = 0.001), spontaneous movement (p < 0.001) and agitation (p = 0.001). The satisfaction scores of the patients (p = 0.007) and surgeon (p < 0.001) were higher in the M group. Onset time was significantly longer in the D group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The combined use of propofol and dexmedetomidine provided cardiovascular stability with decreased adverse effects. Additionally, it led to a similar onset time of propofol and achieved higher satisfaction scores.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 마취통증의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Kyu Nam photo

Kim, Kyu Nam
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF ANESTHESIA AND MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE