Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A Nationwide Retrospective Study of Opioid Management Patterns in 2,468 Patients with Spinal Pain in Korea

Authors
Chung, Sung-SooPark, Chun-KunCho, Kyu-JungChoi, Kyoung HyoKim, Jin-HyokKim, Sung-BumKuh, Sung-UkLee, Jae ChulLee, Jae HyupLee, Kyu-YeolLee, Sun-HoMoon, Seong-HwanPark, Si-YoungShim, Jae HangSon, Byung-ChulYoon, Myung HaPark, Hye-Jeong
Issue Date
Dec-2016
Publisher
대한척추외과학회
Keywords
Spine; Spinal diseases; Chronic pain; Opioid
Citation
Asian Spine Journal, v.10, no.6, pp 1122 - 1131
Pages
10
Indexed
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
Asian Spine Journal
Volume
10
Number
6
Start Page
1122
End Page
1131
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/153425
DOI
10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1122
ISSN
1976-1902
1976-7846
Abstract
Study Design Retrospective patient data collection and investigator survey. Purpose To investigate patterns of opioid treatment for pain caused by spinal disorders in Korea. Overview of Literature Opioid analgesic prescription and adequacy of consumption measures in Korea have markedly increased in the past decade, suggesting changing patterns in pain management practice; however, there is lack of integrated data specific to Korean population. Methods Patient data were collected from medical records at 34 university hospitals in Korea. Outpatients receiving opioids for pain caused by spinal disorders were included in the study. Treatment patterns, including opioid types, doses, treatment duration, outcomes, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs), were evaluated. Investigators were interviewed on their perceptions of opioid use for spinal disorders. Results Among 2,468 analyzed cases, spinal stenosis (42.8%) was the most common presentation, followed by disc herniation (24.2%) and vertebral fracture (17.5%). In addition, a greater proportion of patients experienced severe pain (73.9%) rather than moderate (19.9%) or mild (0.7%) pain. Oxycodone (51.9%) and fentanyl (50.8%) were the most frequently prescribed opioids; most patients were prescribed relatively low doses. The median duration of opioid treatment was 84 days. Pain relief was superior in patients with longer treatment duration (≥2 months) or with nociceptive pain than in those with shorter treatment duration or with neuropathic or mixed-type pain. ADRs were observed in 8.6% of cases. According to the investigators' survey, "excellent analgesic effect" was a perceived advantage of opioids, while safety concerns were a disadvantage. Conclusions Opioid usage patterns in patients with spinal disorders are in alignment with international guidelines for spinal pain management. Future prospective studies may address the suitability of opioids for spinal pain treatment by using appropriate objective measurement tools.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 마취통증의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Shim, Jae Hang photo

Shim, Jae Hang
서울 의과대학 (DEPARTMENT OF ANESTHESIA AND MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE