Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Influence of Mechanical Ventilation on the Incidence of Pneumothorax During Infraclavicular Subclavian Vein Catheterization: A Proipective Randomized Noninferiority Trial

Authors
Kim, EugeneKim, Hyun JooHong, Deok ManPark, Hee-PyoungBahk, Jae-Hyon
Issue Date
Sep-2016
Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Citation
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, v.123, no.3, pp.636 - 640
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
Volume
123
Number
3
Start Page
636
End Page
640
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/153946
DOI
10.1213/ANE.0000000000001431
ISSN
0003-2999
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether we have to interrupt mechanical ventilation during infraclavicular subclavian venous catheterization. In practice, the clinicians' choice about lung deflation depends on their own discretion. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of mechanical ventilation on the incidence of pneumothorax during infraclavicular subclavian venous catheterization. METHODS: A total of 332 patients, who needed subclavian venous catheterization, were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 groups: catheterizations were performed with the patients' lungs under mechanical ventilation (ventilation group, n = 165) or without mechanical ventilation (deflation group, n = 167). The incidences of pneumothorax and other complications such as arterial puncture, hemothorax, or catheter misplacements and the success rate of catheterization were compared. RESULTS: The incidences of pneumothorax were 0% (0/165) in the ventilation group and 0.6% (1/167) in the deflation group. The incidence of pneumothorax in the deflation group was 0.6% higher than that in the ventilation group and the 2-sided 90% confidence interval for the difference was (-1.29% to 3.44%). Because the lower bound for the 2-sided 90% confidence interval, 1.29%, was higher than the predefined noninferiority margin of 3%, the inferiority of the ventilation group over the deflation group was rejected at the.05 level of significance. Other complication rates and success rates of catheterization were comparable between 2 groups. The oxygen saturation dropped below 95% in 9 patients in the deflation group, while none in the ventilation group (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: The success and complication rates were similar regardless of mechanical ventilation. During infraclavicular subclavian venous catheterization, interruption of mechanical ventilation does not seem to be necessary for the prevention of pneumothorax.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 마취통증의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Eugene photo

Kim, Eugene
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF ANESTHESIA AND MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE