Performance of Screening Mammography: A Report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea
- Authors
- Lee, Eun Hye; Kim, Keum Won; Kim, Young Joong; Shin, Dong-Rock; Park, Young Mi; Lim, Hyo Soon; Park, Jeong Seon; Kim, Hye-Won; Kim, You Me; Kim, Hye Jung; Jun, Jae Kwan
- Issue Date
- Jul-2016
- Publisher
- 대한영상의학회
- Keywords
- Breast; Breast neoplasms; Mammography; Mass screening
- Citation
- Korean Journal of Radiology, v.17, no.4, pp 489 - 496
- Pages
- 8
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
- Journal Title
- Korean Journal of Radiology
- Volume
- 17
- Number
- 4
- Start Page
- 489
- End Page
- 496
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/154293
- DOI
- 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.489
- ISSN
- 1229-6929
2005-8330
- Abstract
- Objective: To analyze the diagnostic accuracy and trend in screening mammography in Korea. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively linked the information from hospitals participating in the Alliance of Breast Cancer Screening in Korea (ABCS-K) and the database of the National Cancer Screening Program. We calculated performance indicators, including the recall rate, cancer detection rate (CDR), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate (FPR), and interval cancer rate (ICR). Changes in the performance indicators were calculated as the annual percent change with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: We enrolled 128756 cases from 10 hospitals from 2005 to 2010. The recall rate was 19.1% with a downward trend over time (-12.1% per year; 95% CI, -15.9 to -8.2). The CDR was 2.69 per 1000 examinations, without a significant trend. The PPV was 1.4% with an upward trend (20.8% per year; 95% CI, 15.2 to 26.7). The sensitivity was 86.5% without a significant trend, whereas the specificity was 81.1% with an upward trend (3.3% per year; 95% CI, 2.1 to 4.5). The FPR was 18.9% with a downward trend (-12.4% per year; 95% CI, -16.2 to -8.4). The ICR was 0.5 per 1000 negative examinations without a significant trend. There were institutional variations in the diagnostic accuracy and trend except for the CDR, sensitivity, and ICR. Conclusion: The sensitivity and CDR of screening mammography in the ABCS-K from 2005 to 2010 were compatible with those for Western women. The recall rate, PPV and specificity, however, were suboptimal, although they showed significant improvements over this period. A further analysis is required to explain institutional variations.
- Files in This Item
-
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 의과대학 > 서울 영상의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.