가상시나리오를 활용한 의과대학 학사편입학 지원자의 윤리적 의사결정능력
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김도환 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김은정 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 황진영 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 신좌섭 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 이승희 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-15T16:03:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-15T16:03:12Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-05-14 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-06 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2092-5603 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/154412 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Assessment tools for non-academic qualities such as ethics frequently employ hypothetical scenarios to lay out a contextual framework underlying the corresponding criteria of assessment. Due to the context-specific nature of the assessment criteria, details of the scenarios become very important in obtaining accurate results. This study aims to explore how medical school applicants differ in ethical decision making depending on the types of ethical dilemma scenarios, and how they correlate with academic achievements after admission. In 2014, all 82 applicants invited for an admission interview for a graduate-entry program were asked to complete a questionnaire comprised of 13 hypothetical scenarios. There were three domains (unethical business decisions, unethical academic decisions, and sexual quid pro quos) and participants were made to choose between the profitable-but-unethical choice or the unprofitable-but-ethical choice, using a four-point Likert-type scale. On average, tendencies toward unethical decisions were lowest for sexual favors (1.34±0.46), and highest for gaining academic advantages (2.22±0.56). Unethical decisions for academic advantages and sexual benefits showed significant correlation respectively with the female gender and those who graduated from overseas universities. In addition, the propensity for choosing unethical academic decisions was significantly correlated with high academic achievements in medical school (r=0.396). Not only does this study demonstrate that different levels of ethical decision making depend on the scenarios, but also those differences may be a determinant factor in subsequent academic performances in medical school. In conclusion, given the possible influence of the details of the hypothetical scenarios to the applicant’s responses, careful consideration must be given during their development. | - |
dc.language | 한국어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 연세대학교 의과대학 | - |
dc.title | 가상시나리오를 활용한 의과대학 학사편입학 지원자의 윤리적 의사결정능력 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Ethically Related Decisions in Different Scenarios of Medical School Applicants for Graduate-Entry Program | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 김도환 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17496/kmer.2016.18.2.90 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 의학교육논단, v.18, no.2, pp.90 - 98 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 의학교육논단 | - |
dc.citation.title | 의학교육논단 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 18 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 90 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 98 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | 정기학술지(Article(Perspective Article포함)) | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002121045 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Ethical decision making | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Hypothetical scenario | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Medical school applicants | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Graduate-entry program | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea+82-2-2220-1365
COPYRIGHT © 2021 HANYANG UNIVERSITY.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.