Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Change of nutritional status assessed using subjective global assessment is associated with all-cause mortality in incident dialysis patientsopen access

Authors
Kwon, Young EunKee, Youn KyungYoon, Chang-YunHan, In MeeHan, Seung GyuPark, Kyoung SookLee, Mi JungPark, Jung TakHan, Seung H.Yoo, Tae-HyunKim, Yong-LimKim, Yon SuYang, Chul WooKim, Nam-HoKang, Shin-Wook
Issue Date
Feb-2016
Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Citation
MEDICINE, v.95, no.7, pp.1 - 9
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
MEDICINE
Volume
95
Number
7
Start Page
1
End Page
9
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/155112
DOI
10.1097/MD.0000000000002714
ISSN
0025-7974
Abstract
Subjective global assessment (SGA) is associated with mortality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. However, little is known whether improvement or deterioration of nutritional status after dialysis initiation influences the clinical outcome. We aimed to elucidate the association between changes in nutritional status determined by SGA during the first year of dialysis and all-cause mortality in incident ESRD patients. This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Incident dialysis patients with available SGA data at both baseline and 12 months after dialysis commencement (n=914) were analyzed. Nutritional status was defined as well nourished (WN, SGA A) or malnourished (MN, SGA B or C). The patients were divided into 4 groups according to the change in nutritional status between baseline and 12 months after dialysis commencement: group 1, WN to WN; group 2, MN to WN; group 3, WN to MN; and group 4, MN to MN. Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to clarify the association between changes in nutritional status and mortality. Being in theMNgroup at 12months after dialysis initiation, but not at baseline,was a significant risk factor formortality.There was a significant difference in the 3-year survival rates among the groups (group 1, 92.2%; group 2, 86.0%; group 3, 78.2%; and group 4, 63.5%; log-rank test, P<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the mortality risk was significantly higher in group 3 than in group 1 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-6.03, P=0.01) whereas the mortality risk was significantly lower in group 2 compared with group 4 (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17-0.71, P<0.01) even after adjustment for confounding factors. Moreover, mortality risk of group 3 was significantly higher than in group 2 (HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.22-6.81, P=0.02); there was no significant difference between groups 1 and 2. The changes in nutritional status assessed by SGA during the first year of dialysis were associated with all-cause mortality in incident ESRD patients.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 교육협력지원교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kwon, Young Eun photo

Kwon, Young Eun
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL COOPERATION)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE