Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Etoricoxib in the treatment of Korean patients with osteoarthritis in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Authors
Yoo, Myung ChulYoo, Wan HeeKang, Seung BaekPark, Yong-WookKim, Sung SooMoon, Kyoung HoSong, Yeong WookMin, Byung WooCho, Yoon JeMoon, Seong-HwanBin, Seong-IlBaek, Han-JooShim, Seung CheolLee, Sung WonYoo, Dae HyunMehta, AnishSkuban, AleksandarCukrow, Diane M.Vandormael, KristelYan, Li
Issue Date
Dec-2014
Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Keywords
Celecoxib; COX-2 inhibitor; Etoricoxib; Korean patients; NSAIDs; Osteoarthritis
Citation
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, v.30, no.12, pp.2399 - 2408
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
Volume
30
Number
12
Start Page
2399
End Page
2408
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/158448
DOI
10.1185/03007995.2014.955169
ISSN
0300-7995
Abstract
Objective: We evaluated the COX-2 inhibitors, etoricoxib and celecoxib, in Korean patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: This study included patients (>= 40 years of age) with a clinical and radiographic diagnosis of knee OA. Patients were randomized to etoricoxib 30 mg (qd) or celecoxib 200 mg (qd) in a 12 week randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Prior NSAID users were to demonstrate a worsening of symptoms upon withdrawal of medication. Efficacy endpoints included the time-weighted average change from baseline in the WOMAC VA 3.0 Pain Subscale (100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]; primary endpoint), the WOMAC VA 3.0 Physical Function Subscale (100 mm VAS), and Patient Global Assessment of Disease Status (PGAD) (100 mm VAS). The primary hypothesis was that etoricoxib 30 mg is non-inferior to celecoxib 200 mg as assessed by the primary endpoint (the non-inferiority margin was set at 10 mm VAS). Adverse events (AEs), laboratory parameters, and vital signs were monitored. Results: There were 239 patients (89.5% female; mean age: 63.3 years) randomized to etoricoxib 30 mg (n = 120) and celecoxib 200 mg (n = 119). The differences (etoricoxib vs celecoxib) in least square (LS) mean change (95% CI) for WOMAC Pain, WOMAC Physical Function, and PGAD were -1.63 mm (-5.37, 2.10), -1.32 mm (-4.88, 2.23), and -1.09 mm (-5.48, 3.30), respectively. Drug-related clinical AEs occurred in 6.7% (etoricoxib) and 2.5% (celecoxib) of patients. This study was limited because it was not designed or powered to adequately capture and evaluate rare AEs associated with NSAID treatment. Conclusions: Etoricoxib 30 mg administered once daily in Korean patients with knee OA demonstrated non-inferior clinical efficacy to celecoxib 200 mg over 12 weeks of treatment as assessed by all primary and secondary outcomes. Etoricoxib 30 mg qd and celecoxib 200 mg qd were generally safe and well tolerated.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Yoo, Dae Hyun photo

Yoo, Dae Hyun
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE