Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Long-Term Natural History of Intracranial Arterial Stenosis: An MRA Follow-Up Study

Authors
Ryu, Wi-SunPark, Sang-SoonKim, Young-SeoLee, Su-HoKang, KyusikKim, ChulhoSohn, Chul-HoLee, Seung-HoonYoon, Byung-Woo
Issue Date
May-2014
Publisher
KARGER
Keywords
Intracranial arterial stenosis; Magnetic resonance angiography; Cerebral infarction; Brain imaging
Citation
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, v.38, no.4, pp.290 - 296
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume
38
Number
4
Start Page
290
End Page
296
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/160014
DOI
10.1159/000367587
ISSN
1015-9770
Abstract
Background: Intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) is a major cause of ischemic stroke in Asians. Despite the clinical importance of ICAS, the literature on the natural history of ICAS has been less enlightening. The aims of our study were to evaluate a long-term natural course of symptomatic and asymptomatic ICAS. Methods: 102 subjects (37 symptomatic and 65 asymptomatic) underwent follow-up MR angiography (MRA) with a median time interval between initial and follow-up MRA of 5.7 years (range 3.6-8.5 years). For each patient, the extent of stenosis of five arteries (both middle cerebral arteries, both intracranial internal carotid arteries, and basilar artery) was classified according to five grades, by consensus: normal, mild (signal reduction <50%), moderate (signal reduction >= 50%), severe (focal signal loss with the presence of a distal signal), and occlusion. Because the sample size was too small to adjust for multiple confounders, we applied the propensity score. Results: Mean (Standard deviation) age at initial MRA was 63.5 (9.6) and 54% were men. The progression rate of ICAS differed significantly between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (22 vs. 8%, p < 0.01), indicating a 3-fold risk of progression for symptomatic stenosis compared with asymptomatic stenosis [odds ratio (OR) 3.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-9.95]. After adjustment for propensity score, the OR was 4.84 (95% CI, 1.40-16.7). In the matched cohort, the relative risk of stenosis progression was 5.20 for symptomatic stenosis (95% CI 1.00-27.23) compared with asymptomatic stenosis. Conclusion: We found a greater risk of progression for symptomatic stenosis compared with asymptomatic stenosis.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 신경과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Young Seo photo

Kim, Young Seo
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF NEUROLOGY)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE