Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Effect of peritoneal dialysis modality on the 1-year rate of decline of residual renal functionopen access

Authors
Kim, Chan HoOh, Hyung JungLee, Mi JungKwon, Young EunKim, Yung LyNam, Ki HeonPark, Kyoung SookAn, Seong YeongKo, Kwang IlKoo, Hyang MoDoh, Fa MeeHan, Seung HyeokYoo, Tae-HyunKim, Beom SeokKang, Shin-WookChoi, Kyu Hun
Issue Date
Jan-2014
Publisher
YONSEI UINVERSITY
Keywords
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; end-stage kidney disease; glomerular filtration rate; peritoneal dialysis
Citation
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, v.55, no.1, pp.141 - 148
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume
55
Number
1
Start Page
141
End Page
148
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/160827
DOI
10.3349/ymj.2014.55.1.141
ISSN
0513-5796
Abstract
Purpose: The effect of different peritoneal dialysis (PD) modalities on the decline in residual renal function (RRF) is unclear due to inconsistencies among studies. In particular, the effect of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) modalities [continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) and nightly intermittent peritoneal dialysis (NIPD)] on RRF has not been examined in a large cohort. Materials and Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study to investigate the association between PD modalities and decline in RRF in 142 incident PD patients [34 on CCPD, 36 on NIPD, and 72 on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)]. RRF was measured within 2 months from PD start and at 1 year after PD initiation. Results: The RRF at 1 year after PD initiation was 1.98 +/- 2.20 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in CCPD patients and 3.63 +/- 3.67 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in NIPD patients, which were moderately lower than 4.23 +/- 3.51 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in CAPD patients (p=0.064). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the 1-year rate of decline of RRF between CCPD and NIPD patients, although APD patients had a faster 1-year RRF decline rate than CAPD patients (CCPD and NIPD vs. CAPD: -45.68 and -36.69 vs. 1.17%/year, p=0.045). APD was associated with a more rapid decline in RRF in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing PD, although multivariate analysis attenuated the significance of this finding (beta=-31.50; 95% CI, -63.61 to 0.62; p=0.052). Conclusion: Our results suggest that CAPD might be more helpful than APD for preserving RRF during the first year of dialysis therapy, although there was no significant difference in the 1-year rate of decline of RRF between the two APD modalities.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 교육협력지원교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kwon, Young Eun photo

Kwon, Young Eun
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL COOPERATION)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE