Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

RADIAL TO FEMORAL ARTERIAL BLOOD PRESSURE DIFFERENCES IN SEPTIC SHOCK PATIENTS RECEIVING HIGH-DOSE NOREPINEPHRINE THERAPY

Authors
Kim, Won YoungJun, Jong HunHuh, Jin WonHong, Sang BumLim, Chae-ManKoh, Younsuck
Issue Date
Dec-2013
Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Keywords
Femoral artery; radial artery; arterial pressure monitoring; measurement techniques; vasoconstrictor agents; sepsis
Citation
SHOCK, v.40, no.6, pp.527 - 531
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
SHOCK
Volume
40
Number
6
Start Page
527
End Page
531
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/161319
DOI
10.1097/SHK.0000000000000064
ISSN
1073-2322
Abstract
Objectives: The accuracy of arterial blood pressure (ABP) monitoring is crucial in treating septic shock patients. Clinically significant differences in central to peripheral ABP could develop into sepsis during vasopressor therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference between radial (peripheral) and femoral (central) ABP in septic shock patients receiving high-dose norepinephrine (NE) therapy. Methods and Results: This prospective observational study comparing simultaneous intra-arterial measurements of radial and femoral ABP was performed at a university-affiliated, tertiary referral center between October 2008 and March 2009. Patients with septic shock who needed continuous blood pressure monitoring and high-dose NE therapy 0.1 mu g/kg per minute or greater to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg or greater were included. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Bland-Altman method for comparison of repeated measures. In total, 250 sets of systolic, mean, and diastolic femoral and radial ABP were recorded at baseline and after NE titration. Arterial blood pressure readings from the radial artery were underestimated compared with those from the femoral artery. Overall bias (mean difference between simultaneous measurements) between radial and femoral MAP was +4.9 mmHg; however, during high-dose NE therapy, the bias increased to +6.2 mmHg (95% limits of agreement: -6.0 to +18.3 mmHg). Clinically significant radial-femoral MAP differences (MAP >= 5 mmHg) occurred in up to 62.2% of patients with high-dose NE therapy. Conclusions: Radial artery pressure frequently underestimates central pressure in septic shock patients receiving high-dose NE therapy. Femoral arterial pressure monitoring may be more appropriate when high-dose NE therapy is administered.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 마취통증의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Jun, Jong Hun photo

Jun, Jong Hun
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF ANESTHESIA AND MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE