Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

글라이드스코프(Glidescope)를 사용한 기관 삽관 시 성문부 노출 방법에 따른 삽관 성공률 및 소요 시간의 비교Comparison of Intubation Success Rate and Times Required for Intubation by Glottic Exposure Methods with Glidescope®

Other Titles
Comparison of Intubation Success Rate and Times Required for Intubation by Glottic Exposure Methods with Glidescope®
Authors
장형서박준범오재훈김창선최혁중강보승임태호강형구
Issue Date
Nov-2013
Publisher
대한중환자의학회
Keywords
intubation; laryngoscope; videolaryngoscope
Citation
대한중환자의학회지, v.28, no.4, pp.241 - 246
Indexed
KCI
OTHER
Journal Title
대한중환자의학회지
Volume
28
Number
4
Start Page
241
End Page
246
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/161393
DOI
10.4266/kjccm.2013.28.4.241
ISSN
2383-4870
Abstract
Background: The glottis can be exposed by a Glidescope® during endotracheal intubation using either the epiglottis or valleculae elevation method. We compared the epiglottis and valleculae elevation methods for endotracheal intubations performed with a Glidescope® using differences in success rate, time spent for tracheal intubation and percent of glottic opening. Methods: Forty medical students without experience using a Glidescope® participated in this prospective, randomized study in which they intubated a tracheal tube into a manikin. All participants performed tracheal intubation using the 2 forementioned methods. Twenty students exposed the vocal cord by placing the blade tip in the valleculae (valleculae elevation method; VEM). The other 20 students directly elevated the epiglottis with the blade (epiglottis elevation method; EEM). We separated intubating time into 3 parts: turnaround time to exposing the vocal cord, tube passing time and first ventilating time. Results: The success rate of tracheal intubation using VEM (86.7%, 104/120) was higher than that using EEM (65.8%, 79/120) (p <0.001). VEM resulted in a lower total intubation time (VEM vs. EEM, 23.5 ± 5.3 vs. 29.0 ± 8.7, p = 0.001). The key factor of this difference was the tube passing time (VEM vs. EEM, 7.4 ± 2.5 vs. 12.8 ± 7.4, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Exposing the vocal cord by using VEM during tracheal intubation with a Glidescope® can increase the success rate of tracheal intubation and shorten the time of endotracheal intubation in novices.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 응급의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lim, Tae Ho photo

Lim, Tae Ho
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE