Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Is helical tomotherapy accurate and safe enough for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy?

Authors
Chung, Yoon sunYoon, Hong InKim, Joo HoNam, Ki ChangKoom, Woong Sub
Issue Date
Feb-2013
Publisher
SPRINGER
Keywords
Helical tomotherapy; Stereotactic body radiotherapy; Spine; Intrafractional movement
Citation
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, v.139, no.2, pp.243 - 248
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume
139
Number
2
Start Page
243
End Page
248
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/163383
DOI
10.1007/s00432-012-1321-0
ISSN
0171-5216
Abstract
We assessed the accuracy and safety of spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using helical tomotherapy (HT) via evaluating intrafractional patient movement. From July 2009 to April 2011, 22 patients with spine lesions received SBRT using HT, with a total of 61 fractions. To evaluate intrafractional movement, we compared post-treatment megavoltage CT scans with planning CT images and obtained translational [lateral (X), craniocaudal (Y), anterioposterior (Z)] offsets and total displacements (R). We analyzed the correlation of intrafractional motion with patient and treatment characteristics. We also analyzed dosimetric change to the target and spinal cord, resulting from intrafractional movement, in the three patients that showed the greatest R values. Intrafractional movements were 0.7 +/- A 0.6 mm (X), 1.1 +/- A 0.7 mm (Y), 0.9 +/- A 0.6 mm (Z), and 1.8 +/- A 0.6 mm (R). This movement did not correlate with age, pain score, treatment time, or treatment site. Only patients with lower BMIs have a tendency to move more during treatment. Patient immobilization using wrapping form (thermoplastic mask and BodyFIX(A (R)) system) resulted in less lateral movement and total displacement than others (0.498 +/- A 0.409 vs. 1.138 +/- A 0.637 mm, P < 0.001 for X; and 1.638 +/- A 0.691 vs. 1.976 +/- A 0.495 mm, P = 0.032 for R). However, this intrafractional motion did not affect the dose delivery to the target and spinal cord. SBRT using HT can be a safe treatment modality for spine metastasis with enhanced targeting accuracy.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 공과대학 > 서울 원자력공학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Chung, Yoon sun photo

Chung, Yoon sun
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING (DEPARTMENT OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE