제주에 대한 재현의 폭력과 저항의 역학관계The Dynamic Relation of the Violence of Representation and Resistance for Jeju Island
- Other Titles
- The Dynamic Relation of the Violence of Representation and Resistance for Jeju Island
- Authors
- 이도흠
- Issue Date
- Aug-2012
- Publisher
- 한국기호학회
- Keywords
- 재현의 폭력; 제주도; 폭력의 역동적 관계; 변방의 유배지; 빨갱이 섬; 역사가 소거된 관광의 섬; 4․3항쟁; the violence of representation; Jeju Island; the dynamic relation of violence; the remotest place of exile; island of a red; island of sightseeing without history; Jeju 4․3 resistance
- Citation
- 기호학 연구, v.32, pp.39 - 63
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- 기호학 연구
- Volume
- 32
- Start Page
- 39
- End Page
- 63
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/164905
- ISSN
- 1229-3172
- Abstract
- There were three kinds of the vilolence of representation for peoples of Jeju island: the remotest place of exile, island of a red, a beautiful island of sightseeing without history. I applied the theory of dependent origination to the dynamic relation of violence. Since others is penetrating inside me and I am also penetrating inside others, separating me and others is just a delusion. Therefore, a human being is intrinsically ‘inter-becoming’. A violence is doing between the strong and the weak, between a strain and a strength dynamically. There is a resistance where the violence is doing.
The confucian power elite in Choseon dynasty represented Jeju island as the remotest place of exile. Practically, they had forbidden every peoples in Jeju Island to enter inland, and had exiled the man who the king hate extremely to this island. The discourses that Jeju island is a land of God and Goddess stood against the discourses of exile. However, the latter had the superiority over the former in the struggle of hegemony overwhelmingly.
The ruling class in modernized Korea represented Jeju island as the land of reds for the purpose of covering up a truth of Jeju 4.3 resistance. They had massacred scores of thousands of the residents in Jeju island during Jeju 4.3 resistance. They had forbidden every peoples not only the residents in Jeju Island but also all Korean to express a word about Jeju 4.3 resistance.
After democratization movement against military dictatorship, the discourses that Jeju 4.3 resistance is a massacre of the innocent people by government power stood up to the discourse of reds. Owed to the fall of military dictatorship by democratization movement, the former had the superiority over the latter in the struggle of hegemony.
The capital, government, and the press represented Jeju island as a beautiful island of sightseeing without history. They erased history of Jeju island in the memory of Korean. They regarded Jeju island as the object of sightseeing.
They are developing and exploiting people and resources in Jeju island.
The discourses that described Jeju island as the field of history faced against the discourse of the land of sightseeing. However, because the latter is created and communicated by the capital and the press unlimitedly, so the former is inferior to the latter in the struggle of hegemony.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 인문과학대학 > 서울 국어국문학과 > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/164905)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.