Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

기소절차에 대한 시민참여제도로서 기소심사회 도입방안 -일본 검찰심사회와의 비교 ․ 검토를 중심으로-Prosecution Review Committee as a Civil Participation System in Prosecutorial Procedure

Other Titles
Prosecution Review Committee as a Civil Participation System in Prosecutorial Procedure
Authors
김재봉
Issue Date
2012
Publisher
한양대학교 법학연구소
Keywords
Civil Participation in Criminal Procedure; Prosecution Review Committee; Reviewing Committee on Prosecution in Japan; Civil Committee on Prosecution in Korea; 시민참여; 기소심사회; 재정심사회; 검찰심사회; 검찰시민위원회
Citation
법학논총, v.29, no.4, pp.149 - 174
Indexed
KCI
OTHER
Journal Title
법학논총
Volume
29
Number
4
Start Page
149
End Page
174
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/166625
ISSN
1225-228X
Abstract
Many people criticize nowadays the abuse and improper exercise of prosecutorial power. The people`s standpoint to the prosecution is well expressed in the new coined words, ‘grandeur prosecutor’, ‘sponsor prosecutor’. The dissatisfaction of people with the prosecutory authorities is day by day increasing. Most people think that the existing controlling over the exercise of prosecutorial process, for example, application for judicial review on non indictment (quasi prosecution), reviewing committee on non indictment, is not sufficient. Therefore, we should find new ways to secure the fairness of prosecution. A civil participation in the prosecutorial process is one of them. It is important in two ways. Firstly the fairness of prosecution can be guaranteed, and secondly the civil self governing of their own things can be realized. With the recent introduction of civil participation in the criminal trials in Korea, many people have interest in the civil control and participation in the criminal procedure. Also in the prosecutorial process, the introduction of civil participation systems is vigorously discussed. The civil committee on prosecution was recently introduced and three reform bills for the introduction of civil control system were submitted to the legislature. We can consider two typical models as the civil participation systems in the prosecution. The first one is the pre civil reviewing committee on the prosecution as the grand jury system in the U.S. The second one is the post civil reviewing system on the non indictment as the Reviewing Committee on Prosecution in Japan. Of the two models, the former is more thorough way, people can control the prosecution process. In order to minimize the side effects, this paper suggests to phase in civil participation system. In the first stage, we can introduce a post review system as the Reviewing Committee on Prosecution in Japan. So in this paper, it is in detail studied how a Prosecution Review Committee as a new post review system is introduced, for example, organization, procedure, relationship with the existing checking systems etc.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 법학전문대학원 > 서울 법학전문대학원 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Jae Bong photo

Kim, Jae Bong
SCHOOL OF LAW (SCHOOL OF LAW)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE