Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway during gynecological laparoscopyopen access

Authors
Jeon, Woo JaeCho, Sang YunBang, Mi RangKo, So-Young
Issue Date
Mar-2011
Publisher
the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
Keywords
Lapraroscopic surgery; LMA; Pressure-controlled ventilation; Volume-controlled ventilation
Citation
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, v.60, no.3, pp.167 - 172
Indexed
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Volume
60
Number
3
Start Page
167
End Page
172
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/168874
DOI
10.4097/kjae.2011.60.3.167
ISSN
2005-6419
Abstract
Background: Several publications have reported the successful, safe use of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)-Classic devices in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. However, there have been no studies that have examined the application of volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) or pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) using a LMA during gynecological laparoscopy. The aim of this study is to compare how the VCV and PCV modes and using a LMA affect the pulmonary mechanics, the gas exchange and the cardiovascular responses in patients who are undergoing gynecological laparoscopy. Methods: Sixty female patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups, (the VCV or PCV groups). In the VCV group, baseline ventilation of the lung was performed with volume-controlled ventilation and a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg ideal body weight (IBW). In the PCV group, baseline ventilation of the lung using pressure-controlled ventilation was initiated with a peak airway pressure that provided a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg IBW and an upper limit of 35 cmH2O. The end-tidal CO2, the peak airway pressures (Ppeak), the compliance, the airway resistance and the arterial oxygen saturation were recorded at T1: 5 minutes after insertion of the laryngeal airway, and at T2 and T3: 5 and 15 minutes, respectively, after CO2 insufflation. Results: The Ppeak at 5 minutes and 15 minutes after CO2 insufflation were significantly increased compared to the baseline values in both groups. Also, at 5 minutes and 15 minutes after CO2 insufflation, there were significant differences of the Ppeak between the two groups. The compliance decreased in both groups after creating the pneumopertoneim (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that PCV may be an effective method of ventilation during gynecological laparoscopy, and it ensures oxygenation while minimizing the increases of the peak airway pressure after CO2 insufflation.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 마취통증의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Jeon, Woo Jae photo

Jeon, Woo Jae
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF ANESTHESIA AND MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE