Detailed Information

Cited 47 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Systemic lupus international collaborating clinics renal activity/response exercise - Development of a renal activity score and renal response index

Authors
Petri, MichelleKasitanon, NuntanaLee, Shin-SeokLink, KimberlyMagder, LaurenceBae, Sang-CheolHanly, John G.Isenberg, David A.Nived, OlaSturfelt, Gunnarvan Vollenhoven, RonaldWallace, Daniel J.Alarcon, Graciela S.Adu, DwomoaAvila-Casado, CarmenBernatsky, Sasha R.Bruce, Ian N.Clarke, Ann E.Contreras, GabrielFine, Derek M.Gladman, Dafna D.Gordon, CarolineKalunian, Kenneth C.Madaio, Michael P.Rovin, Brad H.Sanchez-Guerrero, JorgeSteinsson, KristjanAranow, CynthiaBalow, James E.Buyon, Jill P.Ginzler, Ellen M.Khamashta, Munther A.Urowitz, Murray B.Dooley, Mary AnneMerrill, Joan T.Ramsey-Goldman, RosalindFont, JosefTumlin, JamesStoll, ThomasZoma, Asad
Issue Date
Jun-2008
Publisher
WILEY
Citation
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, v.58, no.6, pp.1784 - 1788
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
Volume
58
Number
6
Start Page
1784
End Page
1788
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/172028
DOI
10.1002/art.23456
ISSN
0004-3591
Abstract
Objective. To develop a measure of renal activity in systemic lupus erythematosus and use it to develop a renal response index. Methods. Abstracted data from the medical records of 215 patients with lupus nephritis were sent to 8 nephrologists and 29 rheumatologists for rating. Seven nephrologists and 22 rheumatologists completed the ratings. Each physician rated each patient visit with respect to renal disease activity (none, mild, moderate, or severe). Using the most commonly selected rating for each patient as the gold standard, stepwise regression modeling was performed to identify the variables most related to renal disease activity, and these variables were then used to create an activity score. This activity score could then be applied to 2 consecutive visits to define a renal response index. Results. The renal activity score was computed as follows: proteinuria 0.5-1 gm/day (3 points), proteinuria >1-3 gm/day (5 points), proteinuria >3 gm/day (11 points), urine red blood cell count > 10/high-power field (3 points), and urine white blood cell count >10/high-power field (I point). The chance-adjusted agreement between the renal response index derived from the activity score applied to the paired visits and the plurality physician response rating was 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.59-0.79). Conclusion. Ratings derived from this index for rating of renal response showed reasonable agreement with physician ratings in a pilot study. The index will require further refinement, testing, and validation. A data-driven approach to create renal activity and renal response indices will be useful in both clinical care and research settings.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Bae, Sang Cheol photo

Bae, Sang Cheol
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE