Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Tacrolimus for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Authors
Lee, Y. H.Woo, J-HChoi, S. J.Ji, J. D.Bae, S-CSong, G. G.
Issue Date
Aug-2010
Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Citation
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, v.39, no.4, pp.271 - 278
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume
39
Number
4
Start Page
271
End Page
278
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/174340
DOI
10.3109/03009740903501642
ISSN
0300-9742
Abstract
Objective. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. We surveyed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and open-label studies that examined the efficacy and toxicity of tacrolimus in disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) - and methotrexate (MTX)-resistant or intolerant patients with active RA patients using Medline, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and by performing manual searches. Meta-analysis of RCTs was performed to determine treatment efficacy and safety outcomes. The results are presented as risk ratios (RRs), weighted mean differences (WMDs), or standardized mean differences (SMDs). Open-label studies were included in the systematic review. Results. The four RCTs included 1014 DMARD-resistant or -intolerant patients with DMARD-resistant or -intolerant RA. Median follow-up duration was 6 (range 4-6) months. American College of Rheumatology 20, 50, and 70% (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70) response rates were significantly higher in the tacrolimus 3 mg/day group (n = 390) than in the controls (n = 402) [primary efficacy outcome, ACR50; risk ratio (RR) 2.583, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.095-6.092, p = 0.030], and efficacies in the tacrolimus 1.5-2 mg/day group showed a similar pattern. Patients treated with tacrolimus withdrew from treatment because of adverse events (n = 222) (primary safety outcome, withdrawals due to adverse events; RR 1.475, 95% CI 0.895-2.187, p = 0.053) more frequently than controls (n = 231), although this was not significant. All four open-label studies found that tacrolimus was safe, well-tolerated, and provided clinical benefits. Conclusions. Tacrolimus, at dosages of 1.5-3 mg/day, was found to be effective in DMARD-resistant or -intolerant patients with active RA.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Bae, Sang Cheol photo

Bae, Sang Cheol
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE