인터넷기반서비스발전기금의 헌법적 문제점A Constitutional Study on the Legal Problems of the Fund for Development of Internet-based Service
- Other Titles
- A Constitutional Study on the Legal Problems of the Fund for Development of Internet-based Service
- Authors
- 황성기
- Issue Date
- Mar-2010
- Publisher
- 한양대학교 법학연구소
- Keywords
- Fund for Development of Internet-based Service; Internet-based Service Business Operator; Contribution; Sonderabgabe; Gruppenhomogenität; Sachnähe; Gruppenverantwortung; Gruppennützigkeit; 인터넷기반서비스발전기금; 인터넷기반서비스사업자; 출연금; 특별부담금; 집단적 동질성; 객관적 근접성; 집단적 책임성; 집단적 효용성
- Citation
- 법학논총, v.27, no.1, pp.257 - 282
- Indexed
- KCI
OTHER
- Journal Title
- 법학논총
- Volume
- 27
- Number
- 1
- Start Page
- 257
- End Page
- 282
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/175238
- ISSN
- 1225-228X
- Abstract
- This government is preparing a bill of ‘Framework Act on Internet-based Service Business’(hereinafter ‘the bill’) from the year 2009. The bill contains an article about fund for development of Internet-based service(hereinafter ‘the fund’). According to this article,the fund will be composed of contribution by Internet-based service business operators mainly.
This study analyzes the fund and contribution by Internet-based service business operators from a constitutional point of view.
I think that the fund and contribution by Internet-based service business operators are unconstitutional as follows.
Firstly, the fund and contribution by Internet-based service business operators violate rule of law, because they lack some clear legal grounds required by the principles from rule of law Secondly, the fund and contribution by Internet-based service business operators lacks justifying rationales required by the principle of so-called ‘Sonderabgabe’, which is originated from Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court. The justifying rationales required by the principle of ‘Sonderabgabe’ are composed of ‘homogeneity of the contributing group’(Gruppenhomogenität), ‘objective proximity’(Sachnähe), ‘responsibility of the contributing group’(Gruppenverantwortung), ‘usefulness for the contributing group’ (Gruppennützigkeit). The Korean Constitutional Court incorporates and applies these principle and rationales for reviewing of the constitutionality of funds and compulsory contributions in many cases.
Especially, the range of Internet-based service business operators which compulsory contribution are imposed is so broad, and the logical correlation between the fund and Internet-based service business operators is not clear. Because the fund and contribution by Internet-based service business operators lacks all justifying rationales, they violate the principle of so-called ‘Sonderabgabe’.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 법학전문대학원 > 서울 법학전문대학원 > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/175238)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.