Clinical validation of the lower limit of normal in lung diffusing capacity: Is the lower 5th percentile really the best cut-off value?
- Authors
- Ra, Seung Won; Hong, Sang-Bum; Shim, Tae Sun; Lim, Chae-Man; Lee, Sang-Do; Koh, Younsuck; Kim, Woo Sung; Kim, Dong Soon; Kim, Won Dong; Kim, Tae-Hyung; Oh, Yeon-Mok
- Issue Date
- Jul-2009
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Keywords
- Clinical validation; Lower limit of normal; Diffusing capacity; Confidence intervals; Interstitial lung disease
- Citation
- Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology, v.167, no.3, pp 354 - 356
- Pages
- 3
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology
- Volume
- 167
- Number
- 3
- Start Page
- 354
- End Page
- 356
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/176516
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.resp.2009.05.007
- ISSN
- 1569-9048
1878-1519
- Abstract
- The lower limit of normal (LLN) in pulmonary diffusing capacity has been determined by using the lower 5th percentile or 95% confidence interval (Cl) obtained from a normal reference population. We aimed to test clinical cut-off values (1-99% CI) and to determine the LLN in a population with interstitial lung disease and in healthy subjects, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The best cut-off value of the LLN for differentiating subjects with pathologic proven interstitial lung disease (ILD) from healthy subjects was not the 95% Cl, but the 90% Cl, which gave 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Thus, the 90% CI or the lower 10th percentile for the cut-off value of the LLN might be better than the 95% Cl or the lower 5th percentile in differentiating subjects with pathologic proven ILD from healthy subjects.
- Files in This Item
-
Go to Link
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.