Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Ischemic preconditioning to prevent lethal ischemic spinal cord injury in a swine model

Authors
Lee, Jeong-SangHong, Jong-MyeonKim, Yong-Joo
Issue Date
Jul-2008
Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
Keywords
ischemic injury; spinal cord; ischemic preconditioning
Citation
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, v.21, no.4, pp.209 - 214
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY
Volume
21
Number
4
Start Page
209
End Page
214
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/178160
DOI
10.1080/08941930802262249
ISSN
0894-1939
Abstract
Objective: Paraplegia is a serious complication of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic operations and is the result of ischemic spinal cord injury induced by low perfusion pressure during cross-clamping of the aorta. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) of the heart or brain with reversible sublethal ischemic injury induces resistance to subsequent lethal ischemia. The aim of this study is to investigate whether ischemic tolerance can be induced by IPC of the spinal cord in a swine model. Study Design: The animals were randomly divided into three groups: the sham group (n = 3), control group (n = 6) and IPC group (n = 8). In the sham group, we performed a left thoracotomy without any ischemic injury. In the IPC group, the swine received a reversible ischemic spinal cord injury by aortic clamping for 20 min, whereas in the control group, no aortic cross-clamping was performed. Forty-eight hours later, the animals in both the IPC and control groups underwent aortic clamping for 30 min. Neurological examination was done 24 h later, and then the animals were euthanized for histopathology and a malonedialdehyde spectrophotometry assay of the spinal cord tissue. Results: A statistically significant difference in neurological outcome was observed between the control and IPC groups at 24 h after ischemic injury. The incidence of paraplegia and severe paresis was 100% in the control group and 62.5% in the IPC group (p = .028). Between control and IPC groups, there was no statistically significant difference in histopathology and only a borderline statistical difference in the malonedialdehyde assay of the ischemic spinal cord (p = .0745). Conclusion: In this study, IPC induced protection against a 30-min ischemic insult of the spinal cord, although complete recovery was not achieved (standing up or walking). We expect that combining this IPC with other existing protective methods might lead to a synergistic effect, which warrants further investigation.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 소아청소년과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Yong Joo photo

Kim, Yong Joo
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF PEDIATRICS)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE