Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

ICC규정 이행입법안 연구- 독일 및 스위스의 경우를 중심으로 -Implementing Legislation on the ICC Statute - With Special Reference to the German and Swiss Legislation

Other Titles
Implementing Legislation on the ICC Statute - With Special Reference to the German and Swiss Legislation
Authors
최태현
Issue Date
Oct-2006
Publisher
한양대학교 법학연구소
Keywords
국제형사재판소; 로마규정; 이행법; 협력; 국제범죄; 보편적 관할권; 국가면제; 형법의 일반원칙; 국제범죄법전; ICC협력법; 로마규정이행법; International Criminal Court; Rome Statute; implementing law; cooperation with the ICC; international crimes; universal jurisdiction; state immunity; general principles of criminal law; international crimes code; law on the cooperation with the ICC; International Criminal Court; Rome Statute; implementing law; cooperation with the ICC; international crimes; universal jurisdiction; state immunity; general principles of criminal law; international crimes code; law on the cooperation with the ICC
Citation
법학논총, v.23, no.2, pp.243 - 276
Indexed
KCI
OTHER
Journal Title
법학논총
Volume
23
Number
2
Start Page
243
End Page
276
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/180858
ISSN
1225-228X
Abstract
The successful functioning of International Criminal Court will rely on the cooperation and assistance of States Parties to the Rome Statute. In implementing the Rome Statute on domestic level, it is necessary to enact new law or revise the existing laws in order to incorporate the elements of the international crimes over which the ICC has the jurisdiction and general principles of criminal law and enable Korea to fully cooperate with the ICC. It has been suggested that in enacting the implementation laws the ratifying states separate the international crimes code from the law on the cooperation with the ICC. As to the issue of applicable criminal law provisions, it is important to note that the civil law countries have a very strict approach to rullun crimen sine lege. Therefore, it does not suffice that an act was criminal at the time of its commission, but the crime and the possible range of sanctions must have been defined in a Korean legislation. Concerning the Rome Statute implementation act, this act should regulate the surrender of suspects, as well as, for instance, the taking of evidence, conducting searches and seizure, questioning witness and undertaking other measures which Korea may be required to cooperate with the Court. Moreover, as indicated in the German Law, Korea should not merely implement what it must do under the Rome Statute, but go further than is required by the Statute in order to help the Court to work more effectively and to render its procedures a little smoother.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 법학전문대학원 > 서울 법학전문대학원 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE