Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Effectiveness of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in preventing febrile neutropenia during R-FC chemoimmunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A multicenter prospective phase II studyopen access

Authors
Jeon, YoungwooYang, Duk-HwanOh, Suk-JoongPark, Jin-HeeKim, Jung-AhKim, Sung-YoungChoi, Chul-WonLee, Won-SikKim, In-HoMun, Yeung-ChulMin, Gi JuneEom, Ki-SeongCho, Seok-Goo
Issue Date
Mar-2023
Publisher
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
Keywords
prophylaxis; neutropenia; pegfilgrastim; chronic lymphocytic leukemia; R-FC regimen
Citation
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, v.13, pp.1 - 11
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume
13
Start Page
1
End Page
11
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/185459
DOI
10.3389/fonc.2023.998014
ISSN
2234-943X
Abstract
BackgroundA chemotherapy of rituximab, fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (R-FC) has been accepted as a promising frontline chemotherapy in selected patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Although R-FC regimen is a relatively dose-dense regimen and neutropenia incidence is more than 50%, primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim was not fully recommended in the clinical field. Therefore, the study evaluated the prophylactic effectiveness of pegfilgrastim to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia associated with R-FC of patients with CLL. Patients and methodsA single-arm, multicenter, prospective phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy of prophylactic pegfilgrastim. Thirty-four CLL patients were enrolled and analyzed for neutropenia and other related factors, and comparative analysis was performed with historical cohort. ResultsCompared with our historical cohort, incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia was remarkably reduced during any cycle of chemotherapy (14.7% vs. 48.2% of study cohort vs. historical cohort during C1, 5.9% vs. 65.8% during C2, 12.9% vs. 80.6% during C3, 10% vs. 84.6% during C4, 3.4% vs. 83.6% during C5, and 10.7% vs. 85.7% during C6, p <0.001). Also, cumulative incidence of disrupted chemotherapy was noticeably reduced in study cohort on any cycles of R-FC regimen (8.8% vs. 22.2% of study cohort vs. historical cohort on C2, 9.7% vs. 25.2% on C3, 13.4% vs. 26.9% on C4, 13.8% vs. 45.2% on C5, 17.9% vs. 47.3% on C6, p=0.007). In addition, treatment-related mortality was 5.9%, which significantly reduced compared to 9.6% of our historical cohort (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.79, P = 0.032). ConclusionPrimary prophylactic pegfilgrastim is effective in the prevention of neutropenia/febrile neutropenia, and infection-related mortality during R-FC regimen in patients with CLL.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE