Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of effects between calcium channel blocker and diuretics in combination with angiotensin II receptor blocker on 24-h central blood pressure and vascular hemodynamic parameters in hypertensive patients: study design for a multicenter, double-blinded, active-controlled, phase 4, randomized trialopen access

Authors
Oh, Gyu ChulLee, Hae-YoungChung, Wook JinYoun, Ho-JoongCho, Eun-JooSung, Ki-ChulChae, Shung ChullYoo, Byung-SuPark, Chang GyuHong, Soon JunKim, Young KwonHong, Taek-JongChoi, Dong-JuHyun, Min SuHa, Jong WonKim, Young JoAhn, YoungkeunCho, Myeong ChanKim, Soon-GilShin, Jin hoPark, SunghaSohn, Il-SukKim, Chong-Jin
Issue Date
Sep-2017
Publisher
Korean Society of Hypertension | BioMed Central
Citation
Clinical Hypertension, v.23, pp.1 - 6
Indexed
OTHER
Journal Title
Clinical Hypertension
Volume
23
Start Page
1
End Page
6
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/18775
DOI
10.1186/s40885-017-0074-0
ISSN
2635-6325
Abstract
Background Hypertension is a risk factor for coronary heart disease and stroke, and is one of the leading causes of death. Although over a billion people are affected worldwide, only half of them receive adequate treatment. Current guidelines on antihypertensive treatment recommend combination therapy for patients not responding to monotherapy, but as the number of pills increase, patient compliance tends to decrease. As a result, fixed-dose combination drugs with different antihypertensive agents have been developed and widely used in recent years. CCBs have been shown to be better at reducing central blood pressure and arterial stiffness than diuretics. Recent studies have reported that central blood pressure and arterial stiffness are associated with cardiovascular outcomes. This trial aims to compare the efficacy of combination of calcium channel blocker (CCB) or thiazide diuretic with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Methods This is a multicenter, double-blinded, active-controlled, phase 4, randomized trial, comparing the antihypertensive effects of losartan/amlodipine and losartan/hydrochlorothiazide in patients unresponsive to treatment with losartan. The primary endpoint is changes in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) after 4 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints are changes in msSBP, mean 24-h ambulatory mobile blood pressure, mean 24-h ambulatory mobile central SBP, mean 24-h ambulatory carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, ambulatory augmentation index, and microalbuminuria/proteinuria after 20 weeks of treatment. The sample size will be 119 patients for each group in order to confer enough power to test for non-inferiority regarding the primary outcome. Conclusion The investigators aim to prove that combination of a CCB with ARB shows non-inferiority in lowering blood pressure compared with a combination of thiazide diuretic and ARB. We also hope to distinguish the subset of patients that are more responsive to certain types of combination drugs. The results of this study should aid physicians in selecting appropriate combination regimens to treat hypertension in certain populations.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Shin, Jinho photo

Shin, Jinho
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE