Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The prognostic value of median nerve thickness in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome using magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot studyopen access

Authors
Lee, SoohoCho, Hyung RaeYoo, Jun SungKim, Young Uk
Issue Date
Jan-2020
Publisher
KOREAN PAIN SOC
Keywords
Anatomy; Area Under Curve; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; Diagnosis; Hamate Bone; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Median Nerve; ROC Curve; Wrist
Citation
KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, v.33, no.1, pp.54 - 59
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume
33
Number
1
Start Page
54
End Page
59
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/189324
DOI
10.3344/kjp.2020.33.1.54
ISSN
2005-9159
Abstract
Background: The median nerve cross-sectional area (MNCSA) is a useful morphological parameter for the evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, there have been limited studies investigating the anatomical basis of median nerve flattening. Thus, to evaluate the connection between median nerve flattening and CTS, we carried out a measurement of the median nerve thickness (MNT). Methods: Both MNCSA and MNT measurement tools were collected from 20 patients with CTS, and from 20 control individuals who underwent carpal tunnel magnetic resonance imaging (CTMRI). We measured the MNCSA and MNT at the level of the hook of hamate on CTMRI. The MNCSA was measured on the transverse angled sections through the whole area. The MNT was measured based on the most compressed MNT. Results: The mean MNCSA was 9.01 +/- 1.94 mm(2) in the control group and 6.58 +/- 1.75 mm(2) in the CTS group. The mean MNT was 2.18 +/- 0.39 mm in the control group and 1.43 +/- 0.28 mm in the CTS group. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis demonstrated that the optimal cut-off value for the MNCSA was 7.72 mm(2), with 75.0% sensitivity, 75.0% specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.95). The best cut off-threshold of the MNT was 1.76 mm, with 85% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.87-1.00). Conclusions: Even though both MNCSA and MNT were significantly associated with CTS, MNT was identified as a more suitable measurement parameter.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 교육협력지원교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE