Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A new Centiloid method for F-18-florbetaben and F-18-flutemetamol PET without conversion to PiB

Authors
Cho, Soo HyunChoe, Yeong SimKim, Hee JinJang, HyeminKim, YeshinKim, Si EunKim, Seung JooKim, Jun PyoJung, Young HeeKim, Byeong C.Baker, Suzanne L.Lockhart, Samuel N.Na, Duk L.Park, SeongbeomSeo, Sang Won
Issue Date
Jul-2020
Publisher
SPRINGER
Keywords
Florbetaben; Flutemetamol; Centiloid; Amyloid imaging; Standardization; Alzheimer' s disease
Citation
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, v.47, no.8, pp.1938 - 1948
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING
Volume
47
Number
8
Start Page
1938
End Page
1948
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/189933
DOI
10.1007/s00259-019-04596-x
ISSN
1619-7070
Abstract
Purpose We developed a new method to directly calculate Centiloid (CL) units of F-18-florbetaben (FBB) and F-18-flutemetamol (FMM) without conversion to the PiB standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR). Methods Paired FBB and FMM PET scans were obtained from 20 Alzheimer's disease-related cognitive impairment patients, 16 old controls, and 20 young controls. We investigated the correlations between the FBB and FMM CL units using the direct comparison of FBB-FMM CL (dcCL) method and the standard CL method and compare differences in FBB and FMM CL units between dcCL method and the standard method. Results Following the conversion of FBB or FMM SUVRs into CL units, a direct relationship was formed between the FBB or FMM SUVRs and the CL units using dcCL method (FBB dcCL = 151.42 x FBB dcSUVR - 142.24 and FMM dcCL = 148.52 x FMM dcSUVR - 137.09). The FBB and FMM CL units were highly correlated in both our method (R-2 = 0.97, FMM dcCL = 0.97 x FBB dcCL + 1.64) and the standard method (R-2 = 0.97, FMM CLstandard = 0.79 x FBB CLstandard + 1.36). However, the CL variations between FBB and FMM were smaller when calculated by dcCL method (6.15) than when calculated by the previous method (10.22; P = 0.01). Conclusions Our findings suggest that our direct comparison of FBB-FMM method, rather than the standard method, is a reasonable way to convert FBB or FMM SUVRs into CL units, at least in environments where FBB or FMM ligands are used frequently.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 교육협력지원교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Jung, Young Hee photo

Jung, Young Hee
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL COOPERATION)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE