Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

4개 국가 CDM 사업의 온실가스 감축비용 비교 분석-칠레, 페루, 베트남, 말레이지아Comparison of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission Abatement Cost of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Activities in Four Countries Chile, Peru, Vietnam, and Malaysia

Other Titles
Comparison of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission Abatement Cost of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Activities in Four Countries Chile, Peru, Vietnam, and Malaysia
Authors
노동운손인성임정민김수인
Issue Date
Dec-2020
Publisher
한국기후변화학회
Citation
한국기후변화학회지, v.12, no.5, pp.613 - 643
Indexed
KCI
OTHER
Journal Title
한국기후변화학회지
Volume
12
Number
5
Start Page
613
End Page
643
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/191685
DOI
10.15531/KSCCR.2021.12.5.613
Abstract
Estimation of the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission abatement cost of clean development mechanism (CDM) projects is essential for forecasting the abatement cost of the cooperative approach (Article 6.2) and the sustainable mechanism (Article 6.4) of the Paris Agreement. The purpose of this paper is to compare the GHG emission abatement cost of CDM projects among four countries using the abatement cost information each country. The average abatement cost was $9.65/tCO2 (2020 price) for all types of CDM projects across the four countries. The abatement cost of methane avoidance projects was the lowest ($4.75/tCO2), followed by LFG ($6.49/tCO2), small hydro ($7.67/tCO2), biomass ($9.36/tCO2), energy efficiency ($10.02/tCO2), PV ($10.82/tCO2), fuel switch ($10.92/tCO2), and wind ($18.27/tCO2). There were economies of scale for wind and energy efficiency CDM activities, and the higher investment needs for small hydro, PV, wind, LFG, and methane avoidance since their abatement costs are high. Economies of time existed for small hydro, LFG, methane avoidance, and energy efficiency, and there was an effect of technology development on wind, methane avoidance, and biomass. There was a correlation between abatement cost and the share of CDM activities for methane avoidance, small hydro, and PV CDM projects. A cost-effective mitigation strategy would be to proceed with projects that have higher mitigation potential at the same marginal abatement cost. Thus, at a marginal cost of $10-20/tCO2, the effective strategy would be to proceed with LFG, energy efficiency, methane avoidance, small hydro, wind, biomass, fuel switch, and PV. At a cost of over $30/tCO2, proceeding with LFG, wind, biomass, small hydro, fuel switching, and PV would be cost-effective.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
서울 국제학부 > 서울 국제학부 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher NOH, DongWoon photo

NOH, DongWoon
SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE